Live data from Hacker News

Being Eric Schmidt (On Facebook)

techcrunch.com

1–9 of 9 posts

Re: Being Eric Schmidt (On Facebook)

#5
It's a tradeoff really, had they required an email validation before any actions there would definitely be a drop off rate in completing signups, especially early on when people didn't have large social graphs on facebook to pull them in.

Re: Being Eric Schmidt (On Facebook)

#7
post #2

I'm not sure what to make of this farce, but I'm definitely not following Mike's suggestion to create a facebook account and list all my email accounts there.

You can create an account, add all of your emails, but then limit their visibility to 'Only Me'. That way people can't impersonate you, and you don't need to reveal all of your emails to everyone.

Re: Being Eric Schmidt (On Facebook)

#8
post #7
post #2

I'm not sure what to make of this farce, but I'm definitely not following Mike's suggestion to create a facebook account and list all my email accounts there.

You can create an account, add all of your emails, but then limit their visibility to 'Only Me'. That way people can't impersonate you, and you don't need to reveal all of your emails to everyone.

[deleted]

Re: Being Eric Schmidt (On Facebook)

#9
post #5

It's a tradeoff really, had they required an email validation before any actions there would definitely be a drop off rate in completing signups, especially early on when people didn't have large social graphs on facebook to pull them in.

It's not a tradeoff, but an externality paid with time instead of money. Facebook won't suffer any inconvenience, only non-users of Facebook will.

Add this to their opt-out by default when adding new features, and Facebook is becoming more and more a spam platform.