Live data from Hacker News

Why Do Keynote Speakers Keep Suggesting That Improving Security Is Possible?

usenix.org

1–10 of 184 posts

Re: Why Do Keynote Speakers Keep Suggesting That Improving Security Is Possible?

#2
"Using case studies involving machine learning and other hastily-executed figments of Silicon Valley's imagination, I will explain why computer security (and larger notions of ethical computing) are difficult to achieve if developers insist on literally not questioning anything that they do since even brief introspection would reduce the frequency of git commits."

For anyone who hasn't heard a James Mickens talk, do yourself a favor!

Re: Why Do Keynote Speakers Keep Suggesting That Improving Security Is Possible?

#7
Regarding the "we don't know how this stuff works" point, doesn't the FDA approve a ton of drugs where we don't know the exact mechanism of how it works? Do we need to know exactly and precisely how something works to know _that_ it works?

Re: Why Do Keynote Speakers Keep Suggesting That Improving Security Is Possible?

#8
post #3

James Mickens is pure gold https://mickens.seas.harvard.edu/wisdom-james-mickens

He is like that in real life, too... I am in his department, and every single social event ends with him surrounded by a group of people, listening to his hilarious rants. At the same time, he's a great teacher, too. Somehow you learn things while listening to 90 minutes of his stand-up comedy.

Re: Why Do Keynote Speakers Keep Suggesting That Improving Security Is Possible?

#9

Regarding the "we don't know how this stuff works" point, doesn't the FDA approve a ton of drugs where we don't know the exact mechanism of how it works? Do we need to know exactly and precisely how something works to know _that_ it works?

Yes they do, but they circle the risks with statistics, when the life expectancy and quality of life goes up vs the current best treatment, the unknowns side effects can’t be that bad.
Post reply on HN