551–560 of 565 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Again: this was flagged, but Patrick isn't trying to be inflammatory. I think it's pretty reasonable to suggest that about Torba.
It's not even within a football stadium of being reasonable.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not even within a football stadium of being reasonable.
Maybe it'd be more fair to say "whoever's actually managing Gab". Again, see upthread.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe it'd be more fair to say "whoever's actually managing Gab". Again, see upthread.
I read the thread. It's still not a reasonable thing to say without proof and you don't have any. If I used your logic, it would be entirely acceptable to say youtube supports jihad against the west because it doesn't actively censor Al Qaida recruitment videos. If you had a screenshot of Torba saying he was a Nazi and believed in National Socialism, then it would be reasonable to say.
https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1027671587825172480
You sure you want to keep digging into this sewer? I'm sure there's worse we'll find.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I read the thread. It's still not a reasonable thing to say without proof and you don't have any. If I used your logic, it would be entirely acceptable to say youtube supports jihad against the west because it doesn't actively censor Al Qaida recruitment videos. If you had a screenshot of Torba saying he was a Nazi and believed in National Socialism, then it would be reasonable to say.
Here's another for you: https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1027671587825172480 You sure you want to keep digging into this sewer? I'm sure there's worse we'll find.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Here's another for you: https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1027671587825172480 You sure you want to keep digging into this sewer? I'm sure there's worse we'll find.
[flagged]
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe it'd be more fair to say "whoever's actually managing Gab". Again, see upthread.
I read the thread. It's still not a reasonable thing to say without proof and you don't have any. If I used your logic, it would be entirely acceptable to say youtube supports jihad against the west because it doesn't actively censor Al Qaida recruitment videos. If you had a screenshot of Torba saying he was a Nazi and believed in National Socialism, then it would be reasonable to say.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I read the thread. It's still not a reasonable thing to say without proof and you don't have any. If I used your logic, it would be entirely acceptable to say youtube supports jihad against the west because it doesn't actively censor Al Qaida recruitment videos. If you had a screenshot of Torba saying he was a Nazi and believed in National Socialism, then it would be reasonable to say.
Maybe there's some kind of line that divides "white supremacist who spews Pepe memes and vile anti-Semitism" from "neo-Nazi", but really, does anyone care?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Looks like the ADL didn't like my comment. /s
We've banned this account for using HN primarily for political battle. That's not what this site is for, and we ban accounts that do it, regardless of their politics. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe there's some kind of line that divides "white supremacist who spews Pepe memes and vile anti-Semitism" from "neo-Nazi", but really, does anyone care?
The only thing somebody has to do today to become a "white supremacist who spews Pepe memes and vile anti-Semitism" AND a "neo-Nazi" is vote for Trump. So, more than 51% of the country right there very much care.