LibreOffice 6.1 released
21–30 of 86 posts
Re: LibreOffice 6.1 released
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
here you go: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/6.1#Icon_Th...
Thanks, I hate it. The old icons were far clearer as to their purpose. Save is now a download button in case children don't recognize a floppy...
No, that is the Gnome Icon set, the new Windows Icon set is still a floppy.
Re: LibreOffice 6.1 released
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
Then simply use the older icons :-) EDIT: Three steps: 1. Go to Tools > Options in the menu 2. Click View on the left 3. Then choose Icon style on the right
> Then simply use the older icons :-) Simple for you doesn't mean simple for other people. Without writing down the steps on exactly how-to use the older icons, it doesn't equate to simple in my opinion. IOW, you probably had done yourself a favor to not use the word "simply".
Re: LibreOffice 6.1 released
#24To continue navigation on the website, you need to acknowledge our privacy policy Policy not linked or displayed. After clicking "Privacy Preferences": As the protection of your personal data is an important concern for us, please click on the "More information" link to access our Privacy Policy page No such links anywhere in that thing. But there is one in the page footer: https://www.documentfoundation.org/about-us…
reflects how i remember the UI of libre - ugly. that said keep up the good work guys
Re: LibreOffice 6.1 released
#25When composing documents, I prefer to let the final production medium to dictate the production process. (If I don't, I tend to run into issues relating to the final product that are costly to overcome late in the process.)
With this mindset, I still haven't found the use case for word processors. If I aim for something to be designed well in print, it makes most sense to use a desktop publishing tool like Scribus. For the web, something like Org or Markdown covers 99% of the use cases. Org or manually writing LaTeX is good for print use when fancy designs are not key.
What do you people use word processors for?
Re: LibreOffice 6.1 released
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
reflects how i remember the UI of libre - ugly. that said keep up the good work guys
Feel free to join the Design community and give us a hand - only with more input from volunteers will things get better! https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design
to be clear i didn't mean for my comment above to sound sarcastic -- i know how much effort goes into a project like this and its appreciated by linux users the world over
Re: LibreOffice 6.1 released
#27I have grown increasingly disinterested in Office Suites, and in particular word processors, over time. When composing documents, I prefer to let the final production medium to dictate the production process. (If I don't, I tend to run into issues relating to the final product that are costly to overcome late in the process.) With this mindset, I still haven't found the use case for word processors. If I aim for some…
To answer your question: I only use Libreoffice to write write the occasional letter to state authorities and to write my invoices (which are few). For serious documents, I exclusively use LaTeX as I love not having to care about layout details (it sometimes takes time to figure new stuff out, like putting graphics into the perfect place, but when a deadline is near, the layouting is nothing I have to care about any more).
Re: LibreOffice 6.1 released
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
1. What you've described as 'not "tracking" ' is tracking. It's not third-party tracking but you're still deliberately adding a cookie for the purpose of tracking users across your site. 2. Your privacy policy contains: > !!!add opt-out frame on the website at this position!!!
> 1. What you've described as 'not "tracking" ' is tracking. It's not third-party tracking but you're still deliberately adding a cookie for the purpose of tracking users across your site. OK, we're using open source tools to try to improve the site. Plenty of other FOSS projects do this... Not sure why we're being singled out :-)
Re: LibreOffice 6.1 released
#29I have grown increasingly disinterested in Office Suites, and in particular word processors, over time. When composing documents, I prefer to let the final production medium to dictate the production process. (If I don't, I tend to run into issues relating to the final product that are costly to overcome late in the process.) With this mindset, I still haven't found the use case for word processors. If I aim for some…
Re: LibreOffice 6.1 released
#30I have grown increasingly disinterested in Office Suites, and in particular word processors, over time. When composing documents, I prefer to let the final production medium to dictate the production process. (If I don't, I tend to run into issues relating to the final product that are costly to overcome late in the process.) With this mindset, I still haven't found the use case for word processors. If I aim for some…
I think word processors are just entrenched. People expect this degree of control, and don’t know how better things can be in either direction.
Fun fact: the original Google word processor wasn’t really much of a word processor. It was more akin to LyX, where users chose the type of text they were working with, and then IIRC, CSS styling was applied. But then the pressure to be a “real word processor” got the better of them, and it got rewrote as the thing it is today.
Frame Maker... now that was a nice take on document creation.