Earlier quoted context omitted.
the point is that "just consuming" the electricity is nontrivial. Suppose you've been paid to take some number of megawatt hours of energy. Okay: What do you do with it? At the least useful, you have to safely convert it into heat it without damaging something. More useful would be storing it. If you know how to solve that, yeah, you will make money.
I don't think it's that difficult, depending on how much power you're talking about. You could literally attempt to boil the ocean, if you want to be ambitious. Heat your pool, for a domestic application.
Power Worth Less Than Zero Spreads as Green Energy Floods the Grid
181–190 of 419 posts
Re: Power Worth Less Than Zero Spreads as Green Energy Floods the Grid
#182Earlier quoted context omitted.
Capital costs vs. marginal costs. You're going to build a $100M desalination plant and run it for three hours a day? That's a ton of money sitting idle most of the day, far more than what is recovered with zero operating costs. (This is called the utilization factor -- how long a piece of equipment is used vs. staying idle) Ideally you want useful processes with low capital costs and expensive marginal/energy costs.…
In the oil market, stabilization of price occurs only because a handful of countries (really just Saudi Arabia) maintain extra capacity. They don't run their capital assets at 100%. This is where capitalism fails. You need one absolute authority, some autocrat who doesn't care that their processing plant isn't running at 100%, who is able to react instantly without making new capital improvements. This is the place f…
Re: Power Worth Less Than Zero Spreads as Green Energy Floods the Grid
#183The "solution" to this "problem" is, rather than investing in a green production method, to desperately cling to existing investments by sending lobbyists to the government to convince them that Clean Coal is the future.
I love the line at the end of "The Big Short," I can't remember it verbatim but it was something along the lines of how "once again, like we've always done, we're going to seek out the short term gains and cripple long term ones, for no good reason."
Re: Power Worth Less Than Zero Spreads as Green Energy Floods the Grid
#184Earlier quoted context omitted.
Capital costs vs. marginal costs. You're going to build a $100M desalination plant and run it for three hours a day? That's a ton of money sitting idle most of the day, far more than what is recovered with zero operating costs. (This is called the utilization factor -- how long a piece of equipment is used vs. staying idle) Ideally you want useful processes with low capital costs and expensive marginal/energy costs.…
A desal plant is a useful thing and can be run around the clock off traditional energy sources. The "free energy" hours would help lower the costs. I can even imagine a SETI-like application where people who over-generate power are able to donate it to causes of their preference...
Someone is having to build a lot of highly wasteful, redundant infrastructure.
Re: Power Worth Less Than Zero Spreads as Green Energy Floods the Grid
#185I don't truly understand this "problem". I understand storing the energy in batteries is currently very expensive economically and materially. However I believe there are plenty of "goods" (irrespective of if they are bulk materials, or partially processed products) which have a high processing energy per volume ratio (this does not need to be recoverable stored energy). Allow me to give an example: currently we have…
These systems spin up quickly (at least in residential homes) and are a substantial fraction of our energy use.
Re: Power Worth Less Than Zero Spreads as Green Energy Floods the Grid
#186> It’s left the utilities complaining that they can’t earn the returns they expected for their investment in generation capacity. Good. That's a well functioning market economy. Those who make poor investment choices need to feel the sting of losses else the market fails to work correctly.
Re: Power Worth Less Than Zero Spreads as Green Energy Floods the Grid
#187Earlier quoted context omitted.
In the oil market, stabilization of price occurs only because a handful of countries (really just Saudi Arabia) maintain extra capacity. They don't run their capital assets at 100%. This is where capitalism fails. You need one absolute authority, some autocrat who doesn't care that their processing plant isn't running at 100%, who is able to react instantly without making new capital improvements. This is the place f…
Stabilization? https://www.nasdaq.com/markets/crude-oil.aspx?timeframe=10y
Re: Power Worth Less Than Zero Spreads as Green Energy Floods the Grid
#188I don't truly understand this "problem". I understand storing the energy in batteries is currently very expensive economically and materially. However I believe there are plenty of "goods" (irrespective of if they are bulk materials, or partially processed products) which have a high processing energy per volume ratio (this does not need to be recoverable stored energy). Allow me to give an example: currently we have…
Re: Power Worth Less Than Zero Spreads as Green Energy Floods the Grid
#189A lot of electricity demand can be shifted to when the supply is cheapest.
When the supply varies wildly, like solar and wind do, there's a giant impedance mismatch when demand is charged a fixed price.
Re: Power Worth Less Than Zero Spreads as Green Energy Floods the Grid
#190unfortunately, as far as i know not only is there no consumer tech that does this, but energy companies don't make real-time pricing available to all but the largest consumers.