Live data from Hacker News

Power Worth Less Than Zero Spreads as Green Energy Floods the Grid

bloomberg.com

171–180 of 419 posts

Re: Power Worth Less Than Zero Spreads as Green Energy Floods the Grid

#171
post #107
post #4

Surely Bitcoin miners will snatch up these opportunities soon. Cheap electricity can be translated into money if you have the mining equipment.

Not really. Mining has high capital costs which can't be covered if the energy source isn't reliable. Mines need to run 24/7 to be profitable.

Well, with free/negative electricity you can mine cryptocurrencies with outdated gear, no need to invest into the latest ASICs. It's free money, just not much of it.

Re: Power Worth Less Than Zero Spreads as Green Energy Floods the Grid

#172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Enron "Quien se quemó con leche, ve una vaca y llora." It can seem weird to have an excess of power availability, but it's a consequence of electric power not being easily stored -- electricity is just a good energy _transmission_ system. While using electrostatics (batteries) is possible for storing very small amonts of energy, when you think at a state or country scale, it's just too much to store. This means exc…

To save you the Google tour: > Quien se quemó con leche, ve una vaca y llora. This appears to be a saying that corresponds to the English saying "A burnt child dreads the fire."

But the literal translation is "That who has been burn with milk, watches a cow and cries". Much funnier

Re: Power Worth Less Than Zero Spreads as Green Energy Floods the Grid

#173

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, if I was gonna build a desalination plant built to use Just a big resistor in a big tank (or pond), a big fume hood and coil to another tank. Capital cost can probably be minimized a whole lot.

You can use sun light directly for that. Just paint your boiler black, maybe concentrate some sunlight with cheap mirrors.

This works well when you have a lot of sun. Instead you might have a lot of wind.

Also, you only want to run the desalination plant when the electricity price is too low ("below zero" with the transmission included), so you want generators for most of the time, when you actually sell the power.

Re: Power Worth Less Than Zero Spreads as Green Energy Floods the Grid

#174

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Where I live its about 25c (of Australian Dollar) for 1kwh but you only get 7c back. So a real battery would be much preferable.

Due to subsidies, in the US people dumping home solar into the grid usually get back more than the market rate.

I don't think that's the case. Depending on where you are, you either get paid retail or wholesale rates, and still have to pay some monthly service fee regardless of surplus or deficit. I've never heard of any utility in the US buying solar production at more than retail rates.

Re: Power Worth Less Than Zero Spreads as Green Energy Floods the Grid

#175
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exactly - this will finally make them think twice about installing more generation capacity and will force them to consider installing battery storage or other solutions to fix issues on the grid. These non-generation solutions exist, but utilities love to just install more generation because it's in their playbook and they don't want to innovate.

> utilities love to just install more generation because it's in their playbook and they don't want to innovate. I'm curious, how did you reach this conclusion?

Utilities make a guaranteed rate of return (up to 10%) when they build new generation plants and when they build new transmission lines. This is payed for by rate basing the new costs to customers. The system works great for utilities because they know how to build these plants/wires and the get paid regardless of whether they are truly needed or not.

Local governments and state regulators have finally started to push back against and are now forcing utilities to consider new solutions to grid congestion. https://www.utilitydive.com/news/non-wires-alternatives-what...

Re: Power Worth Less Than Zero Spreads as Green Energy Floods the Grid

#176

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Capital costs vs. marginal costs. You're going to build a $100M desalination plant and run it for three hours a day? That's a ton of money sitting idle most of the day, far more than what is recovered with zero operating costs. (This is called the utilization factor -- how long a piece of equipment is used vs. staying idle) Ideally you want useful processes with low capital costs and expensive marginal/energy costs.…

In the oil market, stabilization of price occurs only because a handful of countries (really just Saudi Arabia) maintain extra capacity. They don't run their capital assets at 100%. This is where capitalism fails. You need one absolute authority, some autocrat who doesn't care that their processing plant isn't running at 100%, who is able to react instantly without making new capital improvements. This is the place f…

Stabilization? https://www.nasdaq.com/markets/crude-oil.aspx?timeframe=10y

Re: Power Worth Less Than Zero Spreads as Green Energy Floods the Grid

#177
post #121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I imagine something like this would happen, if this is a "real" economic phenomenon rather than a quirky price/billing system. I think that it's something like that though, a goof in a not-quite-designed collection of old energy funding/billing setups and newer green energy stuff. Otherwise there'd be someone just consuming electricity for pay. I don't think this is "retail."

the point is that "just consuming" the electricity is nontrivial. Suppose you've been paid to take some number of megawatt hours of energy. Okay: What do you do with it? At the least useful, you have to safely convert it into heat it without damaging something. More useful would be storing it. If you know how to solve that, yeah, you will make money.

I don't think it's that difficult, depending on how much power you're talking about.

You could literally attempt to boil the ocean, if you want to be ambitious. Heat your pool, for a domestic application.

Re: Power Worth Less Than Zero Spreads as Green Energy Floods the Grid

#178
post #2

Last time there were "weird" issues with power someone was gaming the system: Enron. Something about this article just seems off to me, something isn't right from a technology point of view, and I suspect someone is manipulating things. (No, I do not have evidence. Just a feeling like this isn't such a hard problem to solve technically.)

Yes, someone (thing?) is gaming the system: cheaper renewable energy generation assets, and thus, weather (which is inherently unpredictable). When the sun is shining and wind is gusting isn't always at highest demand, which depresses rates during these totally unanticipated spikes in supply. Unless someone is playing God with the weather, I don't think there's a finger to point here.

Re: Power Worth Less Than Zero Spreads as Green Energy Floods the Grid

#179
post #98

I don't truly understand this "problem". I understand storing the energy in batteries is currently very expensive economically and materially. However I believe there are plenty of "goods" (irrespective of if they are bulk materials, or partially processed products) which have a high processing energy per volume ratio (this does not need to be recoverable stored energy). Allow me to give an example: currently we have…

I think Pumped Hydroelectric Storage is what you are looking for. I've seen a few of them here in Switzerland. I think many were originally built out with the train system's grid for it's reliably scheduled low and high capacity times. http://energystorage.org/energy-storage/technologies/pumped-...

Also flywheel storage. Eg:

http://schwungrad-energie.com/schwungrads-success-eu-horizon...

Re: Power Worth Less Than Zero Spreads as Green Energy Floods the Grid

#180
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You "currently" have a drought, but otherwise you have plenty of water, so a desalination plant isn't a wise investment (yet). Also keep in mind that these are energy spikes that cause negative prices, whereas most industrial uses need a constant and even supply. These spikes are countered by periods of little to no energy . This is the biggest problem with (most) renewables, they cannot entirely replace coal or nucl…

> Energy storage (at cost) is an unsolved problem. Super-true. It's actually pretty fascinating how it's currently done in the grid; storage of energy is often done by converting it (at significant efficiency loss) to a mechanical format. Those formats can get very creative---traditional is "pump a bunch of water uphill into an artificial reservoir," but in areas where big dry mines are available, capping the mine an…

I've never heard of this before and it sounds really cool. CAES on Wikipedia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compressed_air_energy_storag... UK project: https://www.storelectric.com/technology/
Post reply on HN