>On flat maps, it’s impossible to represent land mass size on a relative scale. This isn't right. It is impossible to represent both relative position and relative size accurately. Gall-Peters and other equal-area projections accurately represent relative sizes.
There are cartographically reasonable equal-area or nearly-equal-area projections. Why are we still talking about Gall-Peters? Peters was a charlatan who knew very little geography (he didn't even want to give credit to the geographer who discovered his map), and the Gall-Peters projection is Mercator for old-school hippies who think they can promote equality by making Africa taller.
Google Maps is no longer a flat map
71–80 of 173 posts
Re: Google Maps is no longer a flat map
#72"On flat maps, it’s impossible to represent land mass size on a relative scale." Um, no it's not. TechCrunch needs better editors. You just need to use a non-Mercator projection. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gall%E2%80%93Peters_projection
You can represent size or shape correctly, not both. Anyone who uses the Gall-Peters projection is a cop.
You can if you don't mind having a non-rectangular map border.
Re: Google Maps is no longer a flat map
#73Google Maps must be one of the modern wonders of the world, it's still nothing short of breathtaking to zoom out of streetview in crowded London and then land somewhere on a country crossroads in remote Vietnam.
And once you land on those country crossroads, you can continue exploring the area at the street level. It's really an incredible tool for sating wanderlust - just pop over to some place you've wanted to visit and wander the streets via streetview, all from the comfort of your seat! Speaking of which, GeoGuessr [1] is a great example of how to enjoy Google Maps. You start at some random streetview and try to figure o…
https://cloud.google.com/maps-platform/pricing/sheet/
I wonder if this tool stays free, lots of site owners are complaining about paying much more with the new pricing.
Re: Google Maps is no longer a flat map
#74Looks like this isn't rolled out to everyone. I'm not seeing the 3D version (logged in & incognito).
Re: Google Maps is no longer a flat map
#75Google Maps must be one of the modern wonders of the world, it's still nothing short of breathtaking to zoom out of streetview in crowded London and then land somewhere on a country crossroads in remote Vietnam.
Re: Google Maps is no longer a flat map
#76"On flat maps, it’s impossible to represent land mass size on a relative scale." Um, no it's not. TechCrunch needs better editors. You just need to use a non-Mercator projection. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gall%E2%80%93Peters_projection
it's a theorem of differential geometry that we cannot have a (perfectly) accurate 2d map of the earth.
Re: Google Maps is no longer a flat map
#77Google Maps must be one of the modern wonders of the world, it's still nothing short of breathtaking to zoom out of streetview in crowded London and then land somewhere on a country crossroads in remote Vietnam.
Google Earth VR is mindblowing.
Re: Google Maps is no longer a flat map
#78Google Maps must be one of the modern wonders of the world, it's still nothing short of breathtaking to zoom out of streetview in crowded London and then land somewhere on a country crossroads in remote Vietnam.
Re: Google Maps is no longer a flat map
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thank you! I'm actually quite annoyed that Google took away the visible option to disabled the 3D aerial view. It's such a resource hog, and my work's internet is often quite slow, and 3D has far more data to retrieve.
People like you are the reason we need to support IE6
Re: Google Maps is no longer a flat map
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
I get what you're saying, but I'm not sure if planning trips to the other side of the globe qualifies as "daily use" either :-) I think it's neat to see that the route is along a great circle -- that wasn't clear at all before this change.
Unfortunately, the line drawing doesn't make this as cool as it could be. The line representing the flight from BOS to PEK is drawn due west, as would look natural on a 2D map. The real flight (and shortest route) heads north and passes near the north pole. Hope they can update this, which would make international flights seem even more impressive than they already do.