Earlier quoted context omitted.
>It won't be long until my primary gaming rig is ten years old, and it's more than capable of everything I throw at it You must not throw much at it
You can stick a new GPU into a 10 year old machine and it would run modern games admirably.
Lubuntu is taking a new direction
11–20 of 225 posts
Re: Lubuntu is taking a new direction
#12It won't be long until my primary gaming rig is ten years old, and it's more than capable of everything I throw at it. The upgrade cycle is essentially dead. That being said, I'm not clear on what the real difference between Lubuntu and Kubuntu will be now.
KDE and LXQt are radically different, even though they use the same underlying framework. In a way, it'll be the same difference as XFCE vs. GNOME.
It's cool to see LXQt in a state where lubuntu is adopting it as it's primary environment.
Re: Lubuntu is taking a new direction
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
>It won't be long until my primary gaming rig is ten years old, and it's more than capable of everything I throw at it You must not throw much at it
I cannot think of a single AAA title in recent memory that causes my i7 2600k -- an 8 year old CPU -- to struggle. It can play absolutely every single modern game, with the only component upgrade in its 8 year life being the GPU.
Re: Lubuntu is taking a new direction
#14It won't be long until my primary gaming rig is ten years old, and it's more than capable of everything I throw at it. The upgrade cycle is essentially dead. That being said, I'm not clear on what the real difference between Lubuntu and Kubuntu will be now.
Not really for GPUs though. AMD progressed a lot and all the new features are landing in amdgpu, not in radeon. That's important especially for Vulkan support. Older GPUs are locked out of that completely.
CPU progress is less rapid, but something like Ryzen is quite a breakthrough.
Re: Lubuntu is taking a new direction
#15But into the future I am very interested in restoring older laptops with ChromeOS / Neverware. Especially if they meet the requirements for running the Android / Linux container and studio. By mid-2020's chromebooks could account for 5% of global pc market share.
Re: Lubuntu is taking a new direction
#16Wait, what? 50% faster? Is that all? I mean, many tasks are still single threaded and from 2010 to 2018 we have grown 50% in single thread and 100% in multithread? If things were going the "old way" then in 8 years would've seen a 2^(8/1.5) -- well over thirty times speedup (Moore's law as stated by David House who predicted that chip performance would double every 18 months). You can see some of that http://3dfmaps.com/CPU/cpu.htm here.
No wonder there's no point focusing on old CPUs any more.
Re: Lubuntu is taking a new direction
#17I am quite concerned that network security is pushing very usable software and hardware to the junkyard. Is it possible that for a variety of reasons, it is better to have something reliable and stable, than to throw out working software because of intractable browser and network security problems ?
Re: Lubuntu is taking a new direction
#18Writing this comment on a 4th gen Core-i5 laptop running Lubuntu booted into RAM. UX is just incredibly responsive. Up since Jun 1. And would probably run forever ;) But into the future I am very interested in restoring older laptops with ChromeOS / Neverware. Especially if they meet the requirements for running the Android / Linux container and studio. By mid-2020's chromebooks could account for 5% of global pc mark…
Re: Lubuntu is taking a new direction
#19Writing this comment on a 4th gen Core-i5 laptop running Lubuntu booted into RAM. UX is just incredibly responsive. Up since Jun 1. And would probably run forever ;) But into the future I am very interested in restoring older laptops with ChromeOS / Neverware. Especially if they meet the requirements for running the Android / Linux container and studio. By mid-2020's chromebooks could account for 5% of global pc mark…
Re: Lubuntu is taking a new direction
#20On the other side, I always loved GTK apps and their feel/design, but never got to make anything big myself in GTK.
There are other points to this debate than RAM/Resources: Looks and feel, philosophy, feature bloatedness, etc.