These are long overdue reforms. The states east of the mississippi did not have the lionshare of their land retained by the federal government when they became states. West of the river is a different story. With the federal government owning 2/3rds of the land in the west, things are way out of whack.
We’re headed for a future where only the wealthy can enjoy nature
21–30 of 39 posts
Re: We’re headed for a future where only the wealthy can enjoy nature
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think "nature" in this article refers to actual natural treasures (Grand Staircase, Yosemite, etc.), not just some random forest on some rolling hills.
I don't think the Blue Ridge Mountains count as rolling hills, and I would count them among our national treasures. That being said, the fact is that WV's natural resources have been subjected to some of the most profound (and least regulated) economic exploitation in the country. So I don't think the GP's point is correct.
*this is a joke and if you want to argue that i'm implying that everyone in West Virginia is homeless, bless your heart
Re: We’re headed for a future where only the wealthy can enjoy nature
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you expand on this? I genuinely don't understand the "poor people are adjacent to trees" statement in the context of an entire country. Like genuinely this sounds like solid comedy unless I'm missing something here.
When you're a broke white hillbilly, you hunt and fish and do stuff outdoors because its there, its cheap, and there ain't much else to do. Source: Grew up broke hillbilly
Re: We’re headed for a future where only the wealthy can enjoy nature
#24Anyone who's worried only the wealthy will be able to enjoy nature hasn't been to West Virginia.
West Virginia is precisely an example of only the wealthy enjoying nature.
The wealthy retreat to Greenbrier or go skiing at Snowshoe Mountain.
All the while, the working class turn to nature to build squatter camp in the summer to pinch and save for winter shelter since the mines went out of business. In many valleys (not the wealthy ones), nature cannot even provide decent water, the result of contamination from modern top chop mining (by the wealthy). Things have only deteriorated recently, unless you consider not dying young of black lung disease “enjoying nature”.
Re: We’re headed for a future where only the wealthy can enjoy nature
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you expand on this? I genuinely don't understand the "poor people are adjacent to trees" statement in the context of an entire country. Like genuinely this sounds like solid comedy unless I'm missing something here.
When you're a broke white hillbilly, you hunt and fish and do stuff outdoors because its there, its cheap, and there ain't much else to do. Source: Grew up broke hillbilly
Re: We’re headed for a future where only the wealthy can enjoy nature
#26Anyone who's worried only the wealthy will be able to enjoy nature hasn't been to West Virginia.
And the fact that it has vast natural resources is part of why it's poor. If you can forage a meal of morels, trout, and ramps, what's the point of earning a lot of money to go to fancy restaurants? It's not like you're going to get a better meal than that even by dropping a couple hundred bucks in NYC. So you end up with lots of people who living on large parcels of inherited land but not making very much money per…
Re: We’re headed for a future where only the wealthy can enjoy nature
#27Anyone who's worried only the wealthy will be able to enjoy nature hasn't been to West Virginia.
Please tell me you’re joking. West Virginia is precisely an example of only the wealthy enjoying nature. The wealthy retreat to Greenbrier or go skiing at Snowshoe Mountain. All the while, the working class turn to nature to build squatter camp in the summer to pinch and save for winter shelter since the mines went out of business. In many valleys (not the wealthy ones), nature cannot even provide decent water, the r…
Re: We’re headed for a future where only the wealthy can enjoy nature
#28Re: We’re headed for a future where only the wealthy can enjoy nature
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please tell me you’re joking. West Virginia is precisely an example of only the wealthy enjoying nature. The wealthy retreat to Greenbrier or go skiing at Snowshoe Mountain. All the while, the working class turn to nature to build squatter camp in the summer to pinch and save for winter shelter since the mines went out of business. In many valleys (not the wealthy ones), nature cannot even provide decent water, the r…
Well, the wealthy get to take time off of work to go camping and hiking, and the poor people get to dynamite the hills their ancestors settled. Surely they're equivalent.