Live data from Hacker News

2018 Fields Medal and Nevanlinna Prize Winners

quantamagazine.org

21–30 of 54 posts

Re: 2018 Fields Medal and Nevanlinna Prize Winners

#21
Scholze's win has been predicted for quite a while now, as it turns out. He's a number theorist of stunning originality primarily known for developing a new kind of geometry, that of perfectoid spaces, for arithmetic purposes.

Here's an interview with him that will be accessible to nonspecialists:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0QdTYZIfIM

At a higher level, here's an appraisal of his work by a professional in a closely related area:

  It's not often that contemporary mathematics provides such a clear-cut example
  of concept formation as the one I am about to present:  Peter Scholze's
  introduction of the new notion of perfectoid space. The 23-year old Scholze
  first unveiled the concept in the spring of 2011 in a conference talk at the
  Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton.  I know because I was there.  This
  was soon followed by an extended visit to the Institut des Hautes Études
  Scientifiques (IHES) at Bûres- sur-Yvette, outside Paris — I was there too.
  Scholze's six-lecture series culminated with a spectacular application of the
  new method, already announced in Princeton, to an outstanding problem left over
  from the days when the IHES was the destination of pilgrims come to hear
  Alexander Grothendieck, and later Pierre Deligne, report on the creation of the
  new geometries of their day.  Scholze's exceptionally clear lecture notes were
  read in mathematics departments around the world within days of his lecture —
  not passed hand-to-hand as in Grothendieck's day — and the videos of his talks
  were immediately made available on the IHES website.  Meanwhile, more killer
  apps followed in rapid succession in a series of papers written by Scholze,
  sometimes in collaboration with other mathematicians under 30 (or just slightly
  older), often alone.  By the time he reached the age of 24, high-level
  conference invitations to talk about the uses of perfectoid spaces (I was at a
  number of those too) had enshrined Scholze as one of the youngest elder
  statesmen ever of arithmetic geometry, the branch of mathematics where number
  theory meets algebraic geometry.)  Two years later, a week-long meeting in 2014
  on Perfectoid Spaces and Their Applications at the Mathematical Sciences
  Research Institute in Berkeley broke all attendance records for "Hot Topics"
  conferences.
- Michael Harris, "The Perfectoid Concept: Test Case for an Absent Theory"

https://www.math.columbia.edu/~harris/otherarticles_files/pe...

Re: 2018 Fields Medal and Nevanlinna Prize Winners

#22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is this a problem only in countries where you have to pay a lot to study? I did not had to pay for my higher education and the people that had a high talent and potentials achieved good results, there was no need to work to make money for studying and if you are good you got positions at University or get jobs at high paying companies.

In countries like the US it starts at birth. Families in rich areas will send their children to elite, selective high schools that cost upward $30,000+. Some of these schools have strong math and science curriculum and are considered direct feeders to elite universities, such as the ivies. These poorer kids could be high IQ'd just like the richer ones, but with less access to resources, may be very behind their riche…

I agree with all of this, but don't see what it has to do with age. The best 50-year-old mathematicians also heavily tend to come from privileged backgrounds. Privileged upbringing is simply one required component of what it takes to be among the best mathematicians of your generation.

Re: 2018 Fields Medal and Nevanlinna Prize Winners

#23
post #3

It bums me out that the fields medal is largely considered the top prize in mathematics, yet it has age restrictions. To people outside the field, this means that significant developments may go underreported. Edit: Let me address the down votes / polarization on this comment: Ageism in the most esteemed prize of a particular field seems obviously wrong to me. Is there a better alternative available? (That said: kudo…

if the accomplishment is worthy it will get recognition regardless of age

Re: 2018 Fields Medal and Nevanlinna Prize Winners

#24

Scholze's win has been predicted for quite a while now, as it turns out. He's a number theorist of stunning originality primarily known for developing a new kind of geometry, that of perfectoid spaces , for arithmetic purposes. Here's an interview with him that will be accessible to nonspecialists: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0QdTYZIfIM At a higher level, here's an appraisal of his work by a professional in a cl…

https://www.math.columbia.edu/~harris/otherarticles_files/pe...

there was an extra > appended

Re: 2018 Fields Medal and Nevanlinna Prize Winners

#25

Is the Fields Medal going to still be relevant in 10 years, when most of the the major mathematical discoveries are made by deep learning and deep reinforcement learning systems? Already systems are learning to reason about concepts [1] and of course there is classical work on proof checkers [2]. It's very likely that the 2028 Fields medal will be awarded to a programmer, not some mathematical super-genius (assuming…

If you're wondering why you're being down voted, it's because very few people believe mathematical discoveries and proofs are going to be automated any time soon. FCT was exceptional in that the theorists were able to reduce the theoretical proof to a brute force check that no human wanted to do. To be honest, making these claims, especially with such certainty, comes off as rather crank-y.

Re: 2018 Fields Medal and Nevanlinna Prize Winners

#26

Is the Fields Medal going to still be relevant in 10 years, when most of the the major mathematical discoveries are made by deep learning and deep reinforcement learning systems? Already systems are learning to reason about concepts [1] and of course there is classical work on proof checkers [2]. It's very likely that the 2028 Fields medal will be awarded to a programmer, not some mathematical super-genius (assuming…

As a mathematician turned to deep learning, I would say you overstimate the promises of deep learning a bit :-)

Re: 2018 Fields Medal and Nevanlinna Prize Winners

#28
As all winners are once again male, it brings Maryam Mirzakhani's achievements [1, 2], and tragic passing to mind once again [3].

I'm not suggesting that these winners are not deserving, nor suggesting there is bias. I am looking forward to the day a second woman wins the prize.

[1] https://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/maryam-mirzakhanis-p... [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14793217 [3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14776357

Re: 2018 Fields Medal and Nevanlinna Prize Winners

#29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In countries like the US it starts at birth. Families in rich areas will send their children to elite, selective high schools that cost upward $30,000+. Some of these schools have strong math and science curriculum and are considered direct feeders to elite universities, such as the ivies. These poorer kids could be high IQ'd just like the richer ones, but with less access to resources, may be very behind their riche…

I agree with all of this, but don't see what it has to do with age. The best 50-year-old mathematicians also heavily tend to come from privileged backgrounds. Privileged upbringing is simply one required component of what it takes to be among the best mathematicians of your generation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Srinivasa_Ramanujan

Re: 2018 Fields Medal and Nevanlinna Prize Winners

#30
post #20

For those who don't know, Constantinos Daskalakis, one of the winners profiled, proved that finding a Nash equilibrium (for example, in an economy) is a PPAD-complete problem: if anyone discovers an efficient algorithm for finding Nash equilibria, such an algorithm could be used for efficiently solving all other problems in the PPAD complexity class. PPAD problems are widely considered to be intractable. No algorithm…

How do PPAD-complete problems relate to P=NP/NP-complete problems/etc., if they do at all? Your description of PPAD-complete problems reminds me a lot of descriptions I've read of NP-related problems, but this is the first time I've heard of the term "PPAD".
Post reply on HN