The difference is similar to dialup --> cable.
Intel's self-serve support's organized better than Kingston's, but neither offers a subscription to notify of firmware updates like Dell does.
71–80 of 153 posts
The difference is similar to dialup --> cable.
Intel's self-serve support's organized better than Kingston's, but neither offers a subscription to notify of firmware updates like Dell does.
We have one database server with SSD (we need more speed than room) and are pretty happy with them. On a more personal note I use a Seagate Momentus XT in my Macbook Pro and this is the single best investment I made in years! This thing cost a third of a "real" SSD of the same capacity and for what an SSD is shining (boot time, application launch, ...) it's on par. The 4GB SSD cache is really improving the experience…
The one thing that's given me hesitation with regard to it, is the reliability problems Seagate was running into a while back, e.g. the "click of death" (very) premature failures on some of their 1 GB drives.
If anyone has appropriate experience/observations, has their reliability trended back towards its old, high levels?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
My MBP has had a 160 GB Intel X25-M for almost a year and couldn't be happier.
Me either. This is the single best improvement I've made in the last 4 to 5 years. My MBP is awesome with this X25-M. I have adapted myself to use this little 160gb space very confortably using some external storage at home. This is great! I sure do recommend this to anyone!
We are using MLC SSD's in production for our Cassandra clusters. It is very important to consider your workload when implementing SSD's in a production application. There are MLC SSD's and SLC SSD's. The former being reasonably priced (think MLC SSD's have a fixed write lifetime and will die or degrade after a certain number of writes. SLC SSD's have no such limits. Cassandra for example has a very predictable write…
I have a SSD on my Macbook Pro. Totally worth it. Definitely snappier in booting up, starting up apps, and any disk i/o-intensive operations. It's certainly noticeable. Also, you don't need to sweat the higher price per byte, because more and more of my files (and I would assume yours?) are on the cloud every day anyways, so 256GB or even 128GB is fine for me these days.
I'm starting to cycle these SSDs into production, got a couple coming Real Soon Now as vm containers. DBs are next, I just need to decide if I'm going to use flashcache or buy enough to go raid.
We are using MLC SSD's in production for our Cassandra clusters. It is very important to consider your workload when implementing SSD's in a production application. There are MLC SSD's and SLC SSD's. The former being reasonably priced (think MLC SSD's have a fixed write lifetime and will die or degrade after a certain number of writes. SLC SSD's have no such limits. Cassandra for example has a very predictable write…
I don't know about OCZ Vertex, but I remember that Intel bragged that its MLC drives can last for about 5 years even if you write a couple of GBs every day.