Practical Common Lisp (2009)
gigamonkeys.com
Practical Common Lisp (2009)
1–10 of 91 posts
Re: Practical Common Lisp (2009)
#2Note that while this is one of the really good books on Common Lisp it is not new. The copyright is 2003-2005.
Re: Practical Common Lisp (2009)
#3Note that while this is one of the really good books on Common Lisp it is not new. The copyright is 2003-2005.
Has anything really changed, though? QuickLisp, I guess, but that feels like about it.
Re: Practical Common Lisp (2009)
#4This is a great book, but the subject of dealing with mp3s looks painfully dated.
Re: Practical Common Lisp (2009)
#5This is a great book, but the subject of dealing with mp3s looks painfully dated.
I wonder what would be a great replacement topic nowadays. Ruby on Rails era was the blog in 5 minutes. What is "the project" now?
Re: Practical Common Lisp (2009)
#6Re: Practical Common Lisp (2009)
#7Re: Practical Common Lisp (2009)
#8Note that while this is one of the really good books on Common Lisp it is not new. The copyright is 2003-2005.
Any halfway good language has a constant procession of new books being cranked out about it. Reading a new "bible" is required every 3 to 5 years, along with updates to your entire code base.
Re: Practical Common Lisp (2009)
#9Note that while this is one of the really good books on Common Lisp it is not new. The copyright is 2003-2005.
Has anything really changed, though? QuickLisp, I guess, but that feels like about it.
Also Lisp in a Box is no longer available. Nevertheless this book is always on my desk. I refer to it almost on a weekly basis.
Re: Practical Common Lisp (2009)
#10Can anyone please comment what advantages and short-comings Common LISP has over "modern LISP" (i.e. Clojure)?