Hopefully the web server will come back to life in less time than that Cached version at https://archive.is/b0WjK
Worms frozen in permafrost for up to 42,000 years come back to life
11–20 of 159 posts
Re: Worms frozen in permafrost for up to 42,000 years come back to life
#12Re: Worms frozen in permafrost for up to 42,000 years come back to life
#13If we can do this, hey, interstellar travel!
Re: Worms frozen in permafrost for up to 42,000 years come back to life
#14Re: Worms frozen in permafrost for up to 42,000 years come back to life
#15Wow I bet those worms are so confused. Imagine when they showed them smart phones! Probably like that movie Encino man (when do we get Encino man 2?)
Re: Worms frozen in permafrost for up to 42,000 years come back to life
#16Re: Worms frozen in permafrost for up to 42,000 years come back to life
#17Re: Worms frozen in permafrost for up to 42,000 years come back to life
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134%2FS001249661803007... the affiliations list top Russian schools as well as Princeton.
Thanks. If anyone wants easy access using, uhhh, a friend, here is the DOI https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012496618030079
Re: Worms frozen in permafrost for up to 42,000 years come back to life
#19EDIT: It's legit. Thanks to the commenter below. Can anyone in Russia confirm if this is a legit news story? It's being repeated throughout tabloids in the West all referencing this English language Siberian publication, as well as hordes of definite news apsm sites, all appear to be using the same generic images and verbetium or almost verbetium text.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134%2FS001249661803007... the affiliations list top Russian schools as well as Princeton.
Re: Worms frozen in permafrost for up to 42,000 years come back to life
#20 > Some 300 prehistoric worms were analysed - and two ‘were shown to contain viable nematodes’.
This sounds like 300 non-nematode worms were examined, and two of them contained viable nematodes as parasites. Is that correct? Because everything else in the article sounds like the nematodes are the worms, rather than were in the worms.It's a tiny detail, but it's bugging me.