Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seems similar in the UK. Development pauses for a week of archaeologists, then the skyscraper gets built anyway.
In my home town for one such project they came up with a really cool alternative. The basement of the building is encased in glass and you can go see the ruins. Little museum and everything. And the building, or underground parking lot I think, still got built.
Rome's Subway Expansion Reveals Artifacts From The Ancient Past
41–50 of 53 posts
Re: Rome's Subway Expansion Reveals Artifacts From The Ancient Past
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
What a damn shame.
What's the alternative--people stop developing Istanbul, Rome, etc entirely? I can't say I'm entirely unsympathetic to a population that wants development over marginally better understanding of places that already experience high levels of excavation and historical tourism.
An alternative to squeezing a few billion more people onto our already massively overpopulated planet? Madness! (and certainly unpopular among the HN crowd)
Re: Rome's Subway Expansion Reveals Artifacts From The Ancient Past
#43Re: Rome's Subway Expansion Reveals Artifacts From The Ancient Past
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
In my home town for one such project they came up with a really cool alternative. The basement of the building is encased in glass and you can go see the ruins. Little museum and everything. And the building, or underground parking lot I think, still got built.
That's what happened with the new Bloomberg HQ in London. It's a nice museum underground.
For people who have NO idea what was under the new Bloomberg HQ in London, here's a link:
Re: Rome's Subway Expansion Reveals Artifacts From The Ancient Past
#45Re: Rome's Subway Expansion Reveals Artifacts From The Ancient Past
#46It’s weird how our great^5 grandchildren will only find treasures in our dumps, but the cities will still be full of ancient stuff.
It's also that the Romans thought they were going to be around forever so they built everything to last. If you look at the Colosseum, it looks the way it is because it was willfully destroyed and used for construction material over centuries: when Rome became the seat of the Papacy, the Colosseum was remembered as a place where the early martyrs were slaughtered by wild beasts, not as a nice building to be preserved…
Re: Rome's Subway Expansion Reveals Artifacts From The Ancient Past
#47Stupid question: how come so much stuff is buried? Tombs of course. But why do we keep finding other stuff under several meters of earth? It's not like if there are sand storms in Rome like there are in Egypt. And many of these areas have been inhabited continuously since ancient Rome.
In my city, there are leftovers of the old castle walls from the middle ages, which in the core are build on top of the walls from the early medieval age and those in turn are built on top of roman walls. Or the social housing built after WW2 build on top of housing build in 1600s which in turn was build on top of social housing from 1516. Rubble over rubble over rubble for ages and ages.
If you go into the nearby forests and dig, you'll find in order WW2, WW1, medieval, post roman and roman layered on top of each other. There is no tombs, mostly either a battlefield or simply a city being build on top of itself.
A lot of European Cities tend to be like that and lots of places are like that. American cities by comparison are very very young (San Juan manages 400 years and some change, San Augustine comes second), our cities have grown organically over 3000 to 2000 years and through countless wars and catastrophes.
Re: Rome's Subway Expansion Reveals Artifacts From The Ancient Past
#48The really funny thing about doing any construction work in basically any Italian city is that you already know from the start that there is going to be several years of delay due to finding ancient stuff... But it's impossible to dig all of that out (reasons: too big, too disruptive, no funds, happens everywhere, etc). So what usually happens is: take pictures, save some artifact, cover with concrete and go on with…
Re: Rome's Subway Expansion Reveals Artifacts From The Ancient Past
#49It’s weird how our great^5 grandchildren will only find treasures in our dumps, but the cities will still be full of ancient stuff.
It's also that the Romans thought they were going to be around forever so they built everything to last. If you look at the Colosseum, it looks the way it is because it was willfully destroyed and used for construction material over centuries: when Rome became the seat of the Papacy, the Colosseum was remembered as a place where the early martyrs were slaughtered by wild beasts, not as a nice building to be preserved…
Re: Rome's Subway Expansion Reveals Artifacts From The Ancient Past
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seems similar in the UK. Development pauses for a week of archaeologists, then the skyscraper gets built anyway.
In my home town for one such project they came up with a really cool alternative. The basement of the building is encased in glass and you can go see the ruins. Little museum and everything. And the building, or underground parking lot I think, still got built.