Richard Milner on a new U.S. particle accelerator
1–10 of 63 posts
Re: Richard Milner on a new U.S. particle accelerator
#2Re: Richard Milner on a new U.S. particle accelerator
#3Re: Richard Milner on a new U.S. particle accelerator
#4why not finish the one in Texas? yes the facility probably needs repairs but a lot of initial work is done I would think?
Re: Richard Milner on a new U.S. particle accelerator
#5Re: Richard Milner on a new U.S. particle accelerator
#6The top 20 universities in the US are sitting on over a quarter of a trillion dollars in endowment money (including MIT at $15b), which continues to perpetually increase. I'd like to see them step up and almost entirely fund the creation of the EIC (the US Government could still kick in billions of dollars with little hassle). Far better to be directing their wealthy donors toward important projects like this, than a…
Re: Richard Milner on a new U.S. particle accelerator
#7why not finish the one in Texas? yes the facility probably needs repairs but a lot of initial work is done I would think?
More importantly, the SSC site was sold to private industry more than a decade ago.
Re: Richard Milner on a new U.S. particle accelerator
#8The top 20 universities in the US are sitting on over a quarter of a trillion dollars in endowment money (including MIT at $15b), which continues to perpetually increase. I'd like to see them step up and almost entirely fund the creation of the EIC (the US Government could still kick in billions of dollars with little hassle). Far better to be directing their wealthy donors toward important projects like this, than a…
Re: Richard Milner on a new U.S. particle accelerator
#9why not finish the one in Texas? yes the facility probably needs repairs but a lot of initial work is done I would think?
Re: Richard Milner on a new U.S. particle accelerator
#10why not finish the one in Texas? yes the facility probably needs repairs but a lot of initial work is done I would think?
I wish that would happen, the SSC design is even more powerful than LHC. But not sure Texas is culturally the optimal place for such high science these days. Part of the opposition to SSC back in the day was religious. CA or NV might be better.
http://rmitz.org/freebsd.daemon.html
It seems like the SSC was located there as more of a congressional boondogle than serious science?