Live data from Hacker News

How tech's richest plan to save themselves after the apocalypse

theguardian.com

11–20 of 77 posts

Re: How tech's richest plan to save themselves after the apocalypse

#11
post #6

Pretty saddening to read- instead of spending their billions to fight climate change, the rich have the "fuck you get mine" viewpoint. Hell, some of 'em probably made their fortunes on coal and oil. Then again this could just be human nature.

I suspect that many of them are putting resources into both fighting it and escaping it. At least that's what I would do.

Re: How tech's richest plan to save themselves after the apocalypse

#14
What world will you inherit, provided you survive? Short term thinking is exactly the problem. We are all in this together, and your millions in stocks and etfs are worth nothing if the entire world goes to shit.

Sadly Gates is the outlier, not the norm, when it comes to how you use wealth.

Re: How tech's richest plan to save themselves after the apocalypse

#15
post #13

It's intriguing to see rich people feeling just as out of control as the rest of the planet's population. I wonder what that really says about the current state of society? It seems like wealth inequality really benefits no one at all.

I think it also says a lot about the human condition — wealth and power just bring a new set of worries and psychological conundrums, especially if you’re already inclined to want to be in control of your life.

Re: How tech's richest plan to save themselves after the apocalypse

#16
post #13

It's intriguing to see rich people feeling just as out of control as the rest of the planet's population. I wonder what that really says about the current state of society? It seems like wealth inequality really benefits no one at all.

Well, I know that I don't have the funds to preemptively build a giant shelter, wall off some fertile land, and then store some seeds in the shelter so that I can grow food after society collapses. I can't afford to buy a giant container ship and ride out the apocalypse offshore by farming on the deck, away from the angry mobs.

But I bet Thiel or Zuck could afford that.

Seems to me that wealth is a definite means to surviving "the Event".

Re: How tech's richest plan to save themselves after the apocalypse

#17
post #13

It's intriguing to see rich people feeling just as out of control as the rest of the planet's population. I wonder what that really says about the current state of society? It seems like wealth inequality really benefits no one at all.

Thanks you for resuming our injust era.

Re: How tech's richest plan to save themselves after the apocalypse

#18
I'm not wealthy. I've had these same concerns. My wife and I have looked at locations to buy a house in an area that is least likely to be impacted by shifting weather, has farmable land, and is isolated from the coasts to avoid the ~1Bil+ migration once the mideast gets too hot.

There are a lot of really smart people on this site. Am I being crazy? I look at the modern political scene and things going the opposite way of improvement. I look at corporate endeavors to privatize vital commodities (looking at you, Nestle and water). We are seeing each year get worse and worse from a climate perspective, and while there are a lot of brilliant scientists and engineers working through solutions, a lot of eager youth to fix the sins of their elders—is it too late? Or at the very least, isn't it a valid to think that we may be too late and plan accordingly?

For the mega-rich, how is the process different from any other time in history? Isn't the answer to build an army?

Re: How tech's richest plan to save themselves after the apocalypse

#19
post #6

Pretty saddening to read- instead of spending their billions to fight climate change, the rich have the "fuck you get mine" viewpoint. Hell, some of 'em probably made their fortunes on coal and oil. Then again this could just be human nature.

> Pretty saddening to read- instead of spending their billions to fight climate change

A pretty good way to fight climate change would be to mostly stop breeding, because fewer people means less energy consumption and thus less climate change.

Post reply on HN