Why are technical recruiters so clueless?
37signals.com
Why are technical recruiters so clueless?
1–10 of 116 posts
Re: Why are technical recruiters so clueless?
#2I never understood why they stop communicating if an opportunity doesn't pan out? Why wouldn't they be interested in cultivating a long term relationship?
That's what I think I would do if I were a recruiter. I'd keep in touch with say 200 people I know are really good and keep placing them as they switched jobs. I'm guessing at least 10 or 20 of those people would be switching jobs every year.
Re: Why are technical recruiters so clueless?
#3Shoot he should respond to this "I created the Ruby on Rails framework. My base salary is $5,000,000 a year. Looking forward to relocating to SF"
Re: Why are technical recruiters so clueless?
#4My guess is that DHH is primarily annoyed that the spammy email started by addressing him as "Dave".
Re: Why are technical recruiters so clueless?
#5If they’re just going to spam people from emails they find on tech sites, why not just pay some shady Russians to do it?
Based on some of the emails I've gotten, I'm pretty sure that's exactly what some of them do.
It's easier and much cheaper in the short run to just spam everyone with a job opportunity and sort through responses versus actually doing the legwork to find qualified candidates.
Of course, in the long run it's going to make me skeptical of any future opportunities they send my way, and it certainly isn't going to make me want to hire them if I ever find myself on the other side of the table.
Re: Why are technical recruiters so clueless?
#6I never understood why they stop communicating if an opportunity doesn't pan out? Why wouldn't they be interested in cultivating a long term relationship? That's what I think I would do if I were a recruiter. I'd keep in touch with say 200 people I know are really good and keep placing them as they switched jobs. I'm guessing at least 10 or 20 of those people would be switching jobs every year.
You'd have to do a lot to prove to me you're not just cold calling me and actually interested in my career and me as a developer. No recruiter has done that to date.
Having a recruiter "keep in touch with me" now feels awfully a lot like they're cold calling/emailing me. I'll now go to great lengths to take a job not offered by a recruiter.
Re: Why are technical recruiters so clueless?
#7I never understood why they stop communicating if an opportunity doesn't pan out? Why wouldn't they be interested in cultivating a long term relationship? That's what I think I would do if I were a recruiter. I'd keep in touch with say 200 people I know are really good and keep placing them as they switched jobs. I'm guessing at least 10 or 20 of those people would be switching jobs every year.
I have wondered the same thing. Responding and responding in a timely manner when the opportunity doesn't pan out would be an improvement.
Re: Why are technical recruiters so clueless?
#8I never understood why they stop communicating if an opportunity doesn't pan out? Why wouldn't they be interested in cultivating a long term relationship? That's what I think I would do if I were a recruiter. I'd keep in touch with say 200 people I know are really good and keep placing them as they switched jobs. I'm guessing at least 10 or 20 of those people would be switching jobs every year.
'They' are actually robots. In my experience they never stop communicating. Once you are in the database, they'll spam you forever.
Re: Why are technical recruiters so clueless?
#9The main problem here is that Kelly should start using some other tools/source of information instead relying only on "grep" for her job.
Re: Why are technical recruiters so clueless?
#10Why are technical recruiters so clueless?
Because they are a little less clueless than most HR departments.
Are there any recruiters working in technology who get it?
Yes. The top 1 or 2%. The bell curve of competency for recruiters is a lot steeper at the high end, so finding one who "gets it" is difficult. So when you do, keep them. Whether you're hiring or looking, they can change your life.
The problem with this kind of hackery is that it has breed an outright animosity to recruiters in large parts of the tech world.
When you stop to think about it, this may not be such as bad thing for the top 1 or 2% of recruiters. Once the wheat is separated from the chaff, it becomes more straight forward for a competent recruiter to do their thing and gain your trust.
In this way, recruiters have a lot in common with real estate agents, car salesmen, lawyers, and even programmers. The masses of mediocre ones give the whole profession a bad name, but the best rise to the top and really do make a difference.