Sourceforge was briefly free software, proprietary, unpopular and then now kinda-free but nobody trusts them.
A Brief History of SourceForge, and a Look Towards the Future
71–76 of 76 posts
Re: A Brief History of SourceForge, and a Look Towards the Future
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
> defending Microsoft and their new attitude towards open source What’s odd about that? Isn’t their new attitude better than the old, and perhaps “good enough” (at least compared to other giants)? Are you saying nothing they do should be considered good enough by devs, based on the previous history?
Personally, I'm a big believer in second chances in any facet of life, but people seem to act the way you're describing to Sourceforge, despite giving a pass to other entities. It's all a matter of personal perspective.
In any case it does seem like a double standard to not accept the “new people, new philosophy, new chance” in either both or neither case.
Re: A Brief History of SourceForge, and a Look Towards the Future
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Now, if you were in this situation and you decided to come back to the old project a few years later (we're now in the early 2000's) wouldn't you expect to be able to continue where you left off? That's unfair. Back then, storage was expensive, backups were expensive, bandwidth was expensive, server CPU time was expensive. You can't fault them for removing unsupported projects in an era when Microsoft and Yahoo were…
That's a fair argument, but couldn't they at least have sent an email about it?
Re: A Brief History of SourceForge, and a Look Towards the Future
#74Re: A Brief History of SourceForge, and a Look Towards the Future
#75Re: A Brief History of SourceForge, and a Look Towards the Future
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
It might be free now, but I believe there are some non-free parts. For a long time it was proprietary.
Nope it's still free and has always been free. And it's built on Apache Allura which is open source.