Live data from Hacker News

Propelling deep space flight with new fuel source, Momentus prepares for liftoff

techcrunch.com

21–30 of 49 posts

Re: Propelling deep space flight with new fuel source, Momentus prepares for liftoff

#21
post #5

Reminds me of some of Isaac Asimov's stories, where all ships are powered by nuclear reactors that flash water into steam for propulsion.

That's an interesting approach. Where did the water come from? Surely they weren't storing it as H20 on the ship? Seems like you'd only want to keep as much as needed for life support in that state. Stored as separate oxygen and hydrogen?

> Where did the water come from?

Good question! His story "The Martian Way" addresses this. I don't really want to spoil it from you, but basically: where you'd expect.

> Surely they weren't storing it as H20 on the ship?

Why not? It's stable, it's useful for other reasons, and when you've got free energy and easy propulsion, there's no reason not to. (There probably would be some issues with sloshing, actually, but he didn't get into it. Asimov wrote a lot of stories that could be considered Hard Science, but I don't think he'd consider himself an engineer.)

Re: Propelling deep space flight with new fuel source, Momentus prepares for liftoff

#22

Reminds me of some of Isaac Asimov's stories, where all ships are powered by nuclear reactors that flash water into steam for propulsion.

Would this increase the humidity of the local biome? Should we avoid using it in deserts? Filling the tanks with Earth-sourced water would mean Earth bacteria, tardigrades, etc. The bacteria that stuck to the side of the tank, instead of being pulled out with the water-fuel, would reproduce once the tank is refilled from extraterrestrial (sterile) ice & water sources. Could this be a cheap and dirty way of kickstarti…

> Would this increase the humidity of the local biome? Should we avoid using it in deserts?

Space is pretty big, I don't think anyone's ever considered it a problem there.

And re: reproducing in the tank, the temperatures generated would absolutely sterilize everything that was coming out as propellant. You could shove a zoo in there, and it would come out as fine particulate mist of mostly water and maybe some small burnt carbon particulate matter.

There are probably easier ways of spreading bacteria than via clouds, but it's actually an interesting idea - the bacteria could be used as the condensation locus, and cause rain that brings them to the surface. Just do a pass through the upper atmosphere, farting the whole way...

Re: Propelling deep space flight with new fuel source, Momentus prepares for liftoff

#23

Let's say we found a way to make water the fuel of the future (that is used for all (most) of our needs), should we use it? Isn't water (one of) our most precious resource? Should mankind really risk using (wasting) our precious water? Well, we wouldn't loose it if we use it on earth, but space would be a different story (although, if we only use water as fuel for spacecrafts... it would take a while before we deplet…

Let's imagine that we have a new fuel source that works with dirt and sand. Whenever you can excavate, you can use it for fuel. How long until we run out of "land"? Same concept. Except that we have more ocean surface than we have landmasses.

Potable water is precious. Water in general is not.

Re: Propelling deep space flight with new fuel source, Momentus prepares for liftoff

#24

Let's say we found a way to make water the fuel of the future (that is used for all (most) of our needs), should we use it? Isn't water (one of) our most precious resource? Should mankind really risk using (wasting) our precious water? Well, we wouldn't loose it if we use it on earth, but space would be a different story (although, if we only use water as fuel for spacecrafts... it would take a while before we deplet…

You should read Isaac Asimov's "The Martian Way".

Re: Propelling deep space flight with new fuel source, Momentus prepares for liftoff

#25

Let's say we found a way to make water the fuel of the future (that is used for all (most) of our needs), should we use it? Isn't water (one of) our most precious resource? Should mankind really risk using (wasting) our precious water? Well, we wouldn't loose it if we use it on earth, but space would be a different story (although, if we only use water as fuel for spacecrafts... it would take a while before we deplet…

Water is the space fuel of the future. Well, at least the space oil of the future - if you start mining asteroid and comets, water is one of the best component you can get: good for any life around, quite a good solvent if you need one, and more importantly can be a fuel like this or be transformed into oxygen and hydrogen, which is rocket fuel as well.

Also, good luck depleting the water on Earth with space travel. There would be other issues way before this happens.

Re: Propelling deep space flight with new fuel source, Momentus prepares for liftoff

#26
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's an interesting approach. Where did the water come from? Surely they weren't storing it as H20 on the ship? Seems like you'd only want to keep as much as needed for life support in that state. Stored as separate oxygen and hydrogen?

> Where did the water come from? Good question! His story " The Martian Way " addresses this. I don't really want to spoil it from you, but basically: where you'd expect. > Surely they weren't storing it as H20 on the ship? Why not? It's stable, it's useful for other reasons, and when you've got free energy and easy propulsion, there's no reason not to. (There probably would be some issues with sloshing, actually, bu…

Fair enough, it is just fiction after all. I was thinking that storing it as H20 would be a challenge as storing all the water you might need would take a large amount of space. But I suppose if it was for a craft that would never enter an atmosphere the volume wouldn't really be an issue.

Re: Propelling deep space flight with new fuel source, Momentus prepares for liftoff

#27
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's an interesting approach. Where did the water come from? Surely they weren't storing it as H20 on the ship? Seems like you'd only want to keep as much as needed for life support in that state. Stored as separate oxygen and hydrogen?

Why would you want to store your propellant water separately as O2 and H rather than as water? You'd have to react it to turn it into water, water is pretty inert, there's no mass advantage (more of a problem than volume). What am I missing?

I was thinking of volume, but if the craft doesn't need to ever be in an atmosphere then that wouldn't be an issue as I had first thought.

Re: Propelling deep space flight with new fuel source, Momentus prepares for liftoff

#28

Let's say we found a way to make water the fuel of the future (that is used for all (most) of our needs), should we use it? Isn't water (one of) our most precious resource? Should mankind really risk using (wasting) our precious water? Well, we wouldn't loose it if we use it on earth, but space would be a different story (although, if we only use water as fuel for spacecrafts... it would take a while before we deplet…

First, it's fresh, drinkable water, delivered to people who need is, is precious. Not just "water". Second, 7 billions of people who drink and bathe and eat water-dependent food every day and a space mission with a few tons of distilled water every now and then are on completely different scales.

Re: Propelling deep space flight with new fuel source, Momentus prepares for liftoff

#29

Let's say we found a way to make water the fuel of the future (that is used for all (most) of our needs), should we use it? Isn't water (one of) our most precious resource? Should mankind really risk using (wasting) our precious water? Well, we wouldn't loose it if we use it on earth, but space would be a different story (although, if we only use water as fuel for spacecrafts... it would take a while before we deplet…

The only way water would be fuel would be via fusion of the hydrogen portion. Of that it is only currently realistic to use the portion of water that contains deuterium which is a relatively small portion of all water on earth. Also fusion would produce a large amount of power from a small amount of hydrogen, so it would have a small impact on earths water supply. So yes we should use it if we can.

Re: Propelling deep space flight with new fuel source, Momentus prepares for liftoff

#30

Let's say we found a way to make water the fuel of the future (that is used for all (most) of our needs), should we use it? Isn't water (one of) our most precious resource? Should mankind really risk using (wasting) our precious water? Well, we wouldn't loose it if we use it on earth, but space would be a different story (although, if we only use water as fuel for spacecrafts... it would take a while before we deplet…

Fresh water is a precious resource here on Earth because it is so energy intensive to desalinate ocean water. Once we are capable of mining other bodies in the solar system, there is plenty of water to extractt from other planets, moons, and comets. Getting there and back has proven to be by far the hardest part so far. Either way, water and methane will be the primary hydrogen source for liquid propellant, ion engines, and nuclear rockets.

In space, life support is a closed loop system so a lot of water is recycled anyway and with aeroponics, agriculture requires 80-95% less water. Any industrial uses of water will also likely have very efficient recycling (for example, Intel's Arizona plant recycles at least 60% of their water and their company goal is to get to 100% before mid-century). I believe even now, industrial water usage is far bigger than agricultural or personal.

Post reply on HN