Parcel: Fast, zero configuration web application bundler
1–10 of 98 posts
Re: Parcel: Fast, zero configuration web application bundler
#21. The existing tool is way too complicated to configure and slow. Let me introduce a new, zero-configuration, blazing fast tool
2. OK so because it's strongly opinionated there are some things it can't do. So we'll allow you to extend it via plugins. You'll have to configure this.
3. Due to the increasing popularity, we are making a meta-version that lets you re-plug any element in the entire system with one of your own choosing. You'll have to configure this.
4. GOTO 1.
Re: Parcel: Fast, zero configuration web application bundler
#3Re: Parcel: Fast, zero configuration web application bundler
#4But frankly, if a JavaScript developer ever really wants to solve the problem... Learn enough C++ to write the equivalent code that compiles 6.5M in 0.1 seconds (assuming a nice HD).
Re: Parcel: Fast, zero configuration web application bundler
#5Also. What’s up with the obsessive use of emojis everywhere? Take a look at this issue for example: https://github.com/parcel-bundler/parcel/issues/144
Re: Parcel: Fast, zero configuration web application bundler
#6The code looks nice, I hope it has helped you in your life. But frankly, if a JavaScript developer ever really wants to solve the problem... Learn enough C++ to write the equivalent code that compiles 6.5M in 0.1 seconds (assuming a nice HD).
Re: Parcel: Fast, zero configuration web application bundler
#7Please God no. We don’t need another bundler. Also. What’s up with the obsessive use of emojis everywhere? Take a look at this issue for example: https://github.com/parcel-bundler/parcel/issues/144
Just like your comment.
Clearly a lot of people have put good work into this project, and have decided it adds value to their workflow and your first reaction is to sling mud. Maybe try reddit.
Re: Parcel: Fast, zero configuration web application bundler
#8The code looks nice, I hope it has helped you in your life. But frankly, if a JavaScript developer ever really wants to solve the problem... Learn enough C++ to write the equivalent code that compiles 6.5M in 0.1 seconds (assuming a nice HD).
Re: Parcel: Fast, zero configuration web application bundler
#9Please God no. We don’t need another bundler. Also. What’s up with the obsessive use of emojis everywhere? Take a look at this issue for example: https://github.com/parcel-bundler/parcel/issues/144
Re: Parcel: Fast, zero configuration web application bundler
#10Please God no. We don’t need another bundler. Also. What’s up with the obsessive use of emojis everywhere? Take a look at this issue for example: https://github.com/parcel-bundler/parcel/issues/144