For the working class, tech is disrupting faster than it's creating value, the results are more distributional then they are enriching. The self driving car removes the human behind the wheel but does nothing to reduce the cost of the average car. Transportation does not become too cheap to meter - it costs about the same, minus the human salaries, and also minus the cab city tax that was typically redistributed into infrastructure for all.
There is almost no venture investment into say nuclear, too cheap to meter electricity. There is no investment into radically new and automated ways to build cheap, quality housing from locally available materials, or refine more, cheaper ore with less impact on the environment, or manufacture more durable, upgradable goods.
The supply of stuff is not disrupted by massive abundance, just the social rules about who gets what. It used to be the guys building the stuff in every community who were rewarded; now, all their paychecks go to a single dude in San Francisco that wrote a marginally better algorithm for doing stuff and the next day it spread around the world over the Internet. It turns out, there's nothing unique or special about a human body, just a soon-to-be-outdated type of 3D printer - with a software update latency measured in years and limited write cycles.
A basic income capable of lifting people from survival and into knowledge building is on the order of $5000 at current purchasing parity - impossible to finance by any tax or industry unless we radically alter the actual supply of goods.