How to be successful: steal ideas and copy people
1–10 of 11 posts
Re: How to be successful: steal ideas and copy people
#2"find a successful business, discover as much as possible about it, re-implement it all, then battle them for supremacy.”
If you like Max's style though, go ahead and read it - it's well-written, lightly entertaining and thought provoking.
Re: How to be successful: steal ideas and copy people
#3Before someone launches another ad hominem attack on Max, here's the gist of this story: "find a successful business, discover as much as possible about it, re-implement it all, then battle them for supremacy.” If you like Max's style though, go ahead and read it - it's well-written, lightly entertaining and thought provoking.
Re: How to be successful: steal ideas and copy people
#4You aren't really stealing ideas and copying people you are improving them. If you didn't the chance of success would be far slimmer. This is healthy capitalism. This process forces the other company to respond by improving and morphing. If they don't they risk becoming obsolete.
Re: How to be successful: steal ideas and copy people
#5It's everywhere: people going crazy watching sports, gang wars, people scheming to get back at those more 'popular' then they are. It's probably a huge part of why WoW is so successful. Using this to your advantage is bound to boost motivation.
Re: How to be successful: steal ideas and copy people
#6Re: How to be successful: steal ideas and copy people
#7Re: How to be successful: steal ideas and copy people
#8Wrong. The enemy is "everyone else". "They're not using my idea, so they're doing it wrong and I'll kick their asses." I imagine that anyone who ever invented something new must have thought this at some point.
Re: How to be successful: steal ideas and copy people
#9I like this approach. Not because it gives you an easy start but because it forces you to look at a problem or business and think about how it could be done better. You aren't really stealing ideas and copying people you are improving them. If you didn't the chance of success would be far slimmer. This is healthy capitalism. This process forces the other company to respond by improving and morphing. If they don't the…
Doesn't your comclusion here go against the USA's entire full-court-press on maximal "intellectual property"? I mean, we've extended copyrights, we've allowed just about every vague pipe-dream to be patented, and we've actually criminalized reverse engineering in a lot of situations.
I sympathize with your viewpoint, but is that the direction we're heading? Are we heading in the right direction?