Earlier quoted context omitted.
Basically buying stuff made in poor countries. This (more than literally anything else) has made a staggering improvement in the lives of hundreds of millions of people over the last few decades.
> Basically buying stuff made in poor countries. Capitalism is also farm subsidies, tax breaks and other corporate handouts given by rich nations that destroy the farming industries in poor countries. Capitalism (as currently practised, or in its purest, unregulated form) is not an untarnished 'good' by itself. This is without considering how capital is leveraged to the detriment of anything protecting poor people in…
Thailand cave rescue: all 12 boys and coach successfully rescued
461–470 of 569 posts
Re: Thailand cave rescue: all 12 boys and coach successfully rescued
#462Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is 3000 a low enough number? There are 3000 children in concentration camps in the USA separated from their parents. Edit: yes, I have chosen the words concentration camps to evoke the sceptre of the Holocaust. Also note my grandmother is still alive and an Auschwitz survivor. We. have. seen. this. before! 1. Classification 2. Symbolization 3. Discrimination 4. Dehumanization 5. Organization 6. Polarization 7. Prepar…
Exactly, so it is NOT genocide according to the Rome Statute, Article 6 definition. Unless you really want to argue that US ICE is doing this in a deliberate attempt to 'destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group'?
Re: Thailand cave rescue: all 12 boys and coach successfully rescued
#463Earlier quoted context omitted.
People blast McDonalds for putting phrases about tragic situations on their signs. People criticize them for being opportunistic and capitalizing on a tragedy. So, how is this different? Because he happens to be able to build a "submersible" for kids, he should get a pass? Why can't McDonalds say, "Our thoughts are with you" and get a pass?[0] This was pure PR. Everyone claims he's so smart and all this, but he ignor…
>>So, how is this different? Because he happens to be able to build a "submersible" for kids, he should get a pass? Because this wasn't Tesla or SpaceX taking out an ad and saying 'look at all the good we can do!' this was a human using resources in his means to help a situation. In the end it was futile, but it's pretty amazing that they were able to prototype something in days and offer support in the way they know…
How can people be so blind to think he did this solely out of kindness? Pfffffffftttt!!
The public can't make someone a narcissist.
Re: Thailand cave rescue: all 12 boys and coach successfully rescued
#464Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interesting, I'll have to re-read as it's been several years. My original takeaway was that the surface level pro-military engagement aspect was meant as deep irony and that the user was encouraged to draw their own conclusions. Mine was that war is horrific, even if done for the right reasons.
"Yeah, war is horrible, but we have to do it. " That's militarism.
Re: Thailand cave rescue: all 12 boys and coach successfully rescued
#465Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ideologically there is no difference to previous uses of the term. Historically it refers to concentration camps of the second Boer War where over 150,000 people died in camps which concentrated specific settler populations in a manner that made the thinning of their population a foregone conclusion. If it evokes the use of the concept you dislike, rethink your moral stance on it. Not the phrasing of the concept.
It doesn't evoke; it denotes. Like "rain" refers to "water falling from the sky". Not a moral stance whatsoever. The word for non-murderous concentration camps is "internment".
"It's different when we do it."
Re: Thailand cave rescue: all 12 boys and coach successfully rescued
#466Re: Thailand cave rescue: all 12 boys and coach successfully rescued
#467Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's odd that you admit you don't know what went down but are still passing judgement. Even if he did, he didn't interfere or impede rescue efforts and gave them a tool they could possible use in the future. It's cool and a nice thing to do, and doesn't really seem like a big deal.
He did impede rescue efforts if the people on location had to spend even one second on thinking about some half baked solution instead of the task at hand. Why did he do all his stuff in public attracting a lot of attention away from the people risking their lives instead of working on it quietly?
Re: Thailand cave rescue: all 12 boys and coach successfully rescued
#468Earlier quoted context omitted.
So, this is the second time you've said I don't do anything. There is no reason to be rude. My work is in scientific reesarch, and I've worked on projects that made significant improvements to drug discovery, possibly saving millions of lives.
"My work is in scientific reesarch..." Good for you, but that wasn't what I meant. "Do nothing" in regards with the current situation, not in general.
Re: Thailand cave rescue: all 12 boys and coach successfully rescued
#469Why wasn't the death of Saman Gunan more widely publicized? I barely heard about it - in the NYT article on this it's a single sentence 2/3rds of the way through the article. I'd have thought that the concept of someone sacrificing themselves for the recovery of 12 children would have been a major story. The Guardian's liveblog (or whatever this is) doesn't mention it in the first couple pages, nor do the responses o…
Re: Thailand cave rescue: all 12 boys and coach successfully rescued
#470I do my part in promoting captialism, which has done more to pull children out of poverty than any other program or charity in the world. Free market reforms in China and India have done just brain blistering amounts of good in reducing human suffering, from child malnutrition, suicide rates, longevity, and access to healthcare.
How do you tease apart the effects of capitalism and industrialism? Or are they inextricably linked in your world view?
I imagine if someone could accurately answer your question they'd win a Nobel Prize. But there is little doubt free market economies vastly outperform centralized economies. Plus free markets are about exercising freedom over how your labor and assets are used. So yay freedom.