Why stop there? I don’t think Native Americans lived in log cabins. Antibiotics and modern medicine should undoubtedly be cast to the trash heap as well. I can’t help but feel like simply limiting screen time is the solution here...
(2016) Technology destroys people and places. I’m rejecting it
41–50 of 74 posts
Re: (2016) Technology destroys people and places. I’m rejecting it
#42https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/19/a-year...
Re: (2016) Technology destroys people and places. I’m rejecting it
#43This. After downscaling my expenses and started working at 25-50% it's amazing how much time I got now compared to working full time. We really under value time and have a weird perspective on it and what we can use it for. Walking to the shop can take 45 minutes for me now which seem ridiculous for some when a car ride takes 5-10 minutes. But what is not accounted for is that slowness itself has value, I have time for reflection while walking, I get fresh air and move my body, I don't need to worry about a car and its costs. The same goes for food. I used to do alot of take outs when I worked full time but now I don't hesitate to prepare and cook for 2-3 hours, I get a much more intimate experience with food, I learn things and get to eat food that taste great.
Re: (2016) Technology destroys people and places. I’m rejecting it
#44I agree with him that we're at a point where technology is backfiring. 100 years ago anything was pure improvement. Food conservation, mobility, television. But I feel we're hitting a ceiling.
Re: (2016) Technology destroys people and places. I’m rejecting it
#45There should be a middle way between this and our current lifestyle. Eschewing all technology also means eschewing the positive things technology provides to us.
Exactly. There are countless ways to live. There are outliers and extremes that point the way to a sane middle ground. How else would we know the middle without exploration of the fringes?
Re: (2016) Technology destroys people and places. I’m rejecting it
#46Why stop there? I don’t think Native Americans lived in log cabins. Antibiotics and modern medicine should undoubtedly be cast to the trash heap as well. I can’t help but feel like simply limiting screen time is the solution here...
...and I think we will start seeing that happen. I relate this to the Pamphlet wars when printing became cheap. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pamphlet_wars History repeats itself...well it's at least similar.
Re: (2016) Technology destroys people and places. I’m rejecting it
#47People destroy people!
Technology just sits there doing nothing without someone starts using it.
Re: (2016) Technology destroys people and places. I’m rejecting it
#48Technology is not going away, we need to learn to live with it and have it as a tool to better our lives. It feels that today technology has too much control over people lives. The effects of social media are becoming better understood by the day. Maybe it is time to separete better which technologies are really useful from those that are hardly so.
Life is too short to be spent on Instagram (soon deploying it's lite version to many developing countries...)
Re: (2016) Technology destroys people and places. I’m rejecting it
#49Re: (2016) Technology destroys people and places. I’m rejecting it
#50I think his heart is in the right place, but the execution is over-reactive. Here are my ideas that I want to implement for myself: 1. Move back to dumb phones, landlines, or a wifi phone. 2. Limit movie/video consumption to a fixed time limit per day. For example, 1 hour a day. 3. Re-use old technology/re-cycle technology waste before buying new. 4. Move back to bare metal servers, and self-host. 5. Use simpler tech…
We need something like an app store for self-hosted apps, on top of a mesh/P2P network with built-in load balancing, redundancy, and sandboxing; ideally with a distributed data-store. Installing and running Wekan should be no more difficult than creating a Trello account, and should provide a similar level of service availability (say within three nines). Until then, self-hosting is completely infeasible for >99% of the global population.
All of this is technically feasible, someone just has to do the hard work.