Live data from Hacker News

Mathematician-M.D. claims to have solved the 110-year-old Lindelöf hypothesis

viterbischool.usc.edu

71–74 of 74 posts

Re: Mathematician-M.D. claims to have solved the 110-year-old Lindelöf hypothesis

#71
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't MD for..like.. medical doctors ? If he's an MD but without a medical degree (which I guess is the case), then what's the difference betweeen MD, PHD or 'professor' ??

An MD is a medical degree. It's possible to have an MD but not practice medicine professionally in the same way someone can earn a law degree (a JD) but choose to not be a practicing lawyer. "Professor" is a academic title for people at a university or advanced teaching institution. Most professors do have terminal degrees in their respective fields like PhDs, MDs, or JDs, so you could also call a Professor with a Ph…

no stupid

MD is higher because anyone now can be professor and make research but to have a renaissance make like fokas a doctor first then a mathematician is a great thing

Re: Mathematician-M.D. claims to have solved the 110-year-old Lindelöf hypothesis

#73

Just pointing out that interestingly Cambridge, where Fokas is a professor, has not released anything. He is merely visiting USC so it strikes me as weird that they would claim this PR so quickly. Also Mathematician-MD somehow makes it sound like the MD means he is a lesser mathematician or not a full mathematician. Fokas is a well respected Professor at one of the top applied Maths departments in the world. A better…

he is a genius polymath . what are you?? just a stupid shit

he is a doctor who has a great memory of information and shapes of diseases and he is a great logical person mathematician

Re: Mathematician-M.D. claims to have solved the 110-year-old Lindelöf hypothesis

#74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I actually believe the intent is the opposite. I think the PR people are just trying to sell Fokas as a polymath genius. "Look, he is not only a mathematician but also an MD, wow!"

Thank you, I had not considered that. I think researchers or a HN audience may perceive this differently than the average reader.

yes researchers perceive this different than you stupid
Post reply on HN