Live data from Hacker News

The Dangers of Train Yards, Through the Eyes of Railroad Employees

atlasobscura.com

21–30 of 106 posts

Re: The Dangers of Train Yards, Through the Eyes of Railroad Employees

#21
post #4

When I worked for BNSF I heard a story about a guy crushed between two cars in the knuckle because he lost line of sight with his engineer and they were using hand signals instead of a radio. They were able to keep him alive long enough to cover him with a tarp and bring his family in to say goodbye. He died immediately upon separation of the knuckle.

Do you get joy from just making up stories and pretending you were there?

I've heard this story perhaps as frequently as I hear about people who go cow tipping. But then I ask and it back tracks 'Oh, did I say I went cow tipping? I meant I sat in the car while some friends went cow tipping. And no, I guess I didn't see any cows. And we were parked in a taco bell parking lot.'

Re: The Dangers of Train Yards, Through the Eyes of Railroad Employees

#22
post #15

Not to make light of railyard hazards, but: > the union had more than 30 railroad employees take photos of their workplace in an effort to demonstrate the hazards firemen could help navigate around. suggests that the presumably union workers may have tended to choose to take photos of the more (or most) dangerous locations. For a company perspective from the 1940s, see ""Why Risk Your Life?" -- 1940s Railroad Safety…

...choose to take photos of the more (or most) dangerous locations...

That would be where the accidents happen, right? Thus the photos are taken there.

Re: The Dangers of Train Yards, Through the Eyes of Railroad Employees

#23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> 5mph would take nearly 1000' to bring to an "emergency" stop. That seems far fetched. 1000' is a long way at 5mph. The number of engines doesn't matter. Each car has its own brakes in an emergency. Cut pressure in the line and every car will brake itself. Perhaps they meant situations involving hills, not uncommon for ore trains heading from mines.

A train's emergency braking system is somewhat sacrificial (using it can damage engines, cars, etc.) so you're probably correct. I'd say that in either case, most people who are not "train people" will dramatically underestimate the required stopping distance. The mass of a fully loaded train is surprisingly large.

Car drivers tend to underestimate the amount of space it takes for a semi to stop. Heck, every time I load up my car or attach a trailer, it takes time to become accustomed to the decreased braking performance.

Drivers likely could not give an accurate estimation for how many feet it takes to do anything on the road, such as come to a stop in an SUV going 50. Given the extreme mass of a cargo train, I wouldn't be surprised if the distance figures sounded high.

Re: The Dangers of Train Yards, Through the Eyes of Railroad Employees

#24
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is an old urban legend. Feel free to Google it, and you will see everyone who has worked near trains knows a guy who knows a guy who this exact thing happened to. Edit: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/the-last-kiss/

And excavator and backhoe workers too as well as heavy presses.

Eh, /r/watchpeopledie has taught me that heavy equipment will murder you in a violent fashion if you don't respect it.

Re: The Dangers of Train Yards, Through the Eyes of Railroad Employees

#25
post #12
post #6

Because of signal sighting rules in the UK, we experienced a lot of trouble upgrading lines to higher speed. All of a sudden, that signal that you could see for 10 seconds could now only be seen for 8 due to a bridge or whatever. Muchos dollars relocating signals and in some places not being able to increase the line speed at all. Boring but very real reasons why we "can't just update things"

Dunno why they don't just go ahead and bite the bullet and go to 100% in-cab signaling. The technology has worked for decades and has been deployed on many lines, including a few in the UK.

You'd have to upgrade all the rolling stock as well. That's not always possible, for technical or financial reasons.

Re: The Dangers of Train Yards, Through the Eyes of Railroad Employees

#26
post #9

I got a chance to drive a couple of different engines at the Plumas rail museum. And one of the things that does is help you internalize the amazing amount of mass and momentum a train carries around all the time. The engineer who was with us spoke of freight trains that were a hundred cars of iron ore that, even though they were travelling at only 5mph would take nearly 1000' to bring to an "emergency" stop. While I…

>> 5mph would take nearly 1000' to bring to an "emergency" stop. That seems far fetched. 1000' is a long way at 5mph. The number of engines doesn't matter. Each car has its own brakes in an emergency. Cut pressure in the line and every car will brake itself. Perhaps they meant situations involving hills, not uncommon for ore trains heading from mines.

You don't want to lock up the wheels in an emergency. Locked wheels will skid on the rails, creating flat spots on the wheel. Later, if not repaired, the rotating wheel can hammer the rail at the flat spot, causing the rail to break.

Re: The Dangers of Train Yards, Through the Eyes of Railroad Employees

#27
post #21
post #4

When I worked for BNSF I heard a story about a guy crushed between two cars in the knuckle because he lost line of sight with his engineer and they were using hand signals instead of a radio. They were able to keep him alive long enough to cover him with a tarp and bring his family in to say goodbye. He died immediately upon separation of the knuckle.

Do you get joy from just making up stories and pretending you were there? I've heard this story perhaps as frequently as I hear about people who go cow tipping. But then I ask and it back tracks 'Oh, did I say I went cow tipping? I meant I sat in the car while some friends went cow tipping. And no, I guess I didn't see any cows. And we were parked in a taco bell parking lot.'

/r/watchpeopledie tells me that yes, some people are out experiencing those stories.

Re: The Dangers of Train Yards, Through the Eyes of Railroad Employees

#28
post #9

I got a chance to drive a couple of different engines at the Plumas rail museum. And one of the things that does is help you internalize the amazing amount of mass and momentum a train carries around all the time. The engineer who was with us spoke of freight trains that were a hundred cars of iron ore that, even though they were travelling at only 5mph would take nearly 1000' to bring to an "emergency" stop. While I…

>> 5mph would take nearly 1000' to bring to an "emergency" stop. That seems far fetched. 1000' is a long way at 5mph. The number of engines doesn't matter. Each car has its own brakes in an emergency. Cut pressure in the line and every car will brake itself. Perhaps they meant situations involving hills, not uncommon for ore trains heading from mines.

It takes a while until the brakes in the last car start braking because the pressure doesn't drop everywhere simultaneously.

Re: The Dangers of Train Yards, Through the Eyes of Railroad Employees

#29
post #4

When I worked for BNSF I heard a story about a guy crushed between two cars in the knuckle because he lost line of sight with his engineer and they were using hand signals instead of a radio. They were able to keep him alive long enough to cover him with a tarp and bring his family in to say goodbye. He died immediately upon separation of the knuckle.

This is an old urban legend. Feel free to Google it, and you will see everyone who has worked near trains knows a guy who knows a guy who this exact thing happened to. Edit: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/the-last-kiss/

That particular story is an urban legend, but fatal shunting accidents are sadly not. See https://www.gov.uk/raib-reports/fatal-accident-at-grosmont-n... for a recent example (an amateur on a preserved steam line in this case; the mainline railway in the UK minimises manual shunting as much as possible)

Re: The Dangers of Train Yards, Through the Eyes of Railroad Employees

#30
post #15

Not to make light of railyard hazards, but: > the union had more than 30 railroad employees take photos of their workplace in an effort to demonstrate the hazards firemen could help navigate around. suggests that the presumably union workers may have tended to choose to take photos of the more (or most) dangerous locations. For a company perspective from the 1940s, see ""Why Risk Your Life?" -- 1940s Railroad Safety…

Yep. Modern yards today are pretty efficient affairs and are designed for safety from the ground up.

Compare those photos to Union Pacific’s Global III yard in Illinois: https://www.hanson-inc.com/portfolio/Union-Pacific-Railroad-...

Fundamentally different designs then and now as they aren’t trying to load boxcars and instead transload containers.

Post reply on HN