Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wish that if they’re gonna downrank “good” pirate content then they should do the same (or worse) for the bad/malicious ones. Whether you’re pro or anti piracy, replacing that content with malware & scams does not make the world a better place.
> I wish that if they’re gonna downrank “good” pirate content then they should do the same (or worse) for the bad/malicious ones. I'm pretty confident they'd like to but it's a tricky problem. Based on this article, they're downranking based on number of legit DMCA requests - the good sites will generate a lot of signal on that front. The bad/malicious sites won't. The malicious/scam sites usually come and go quickly…
Google Downranks 65,000 Pirate Sites in Search Results
181–190 of 261 posts
Re: Google Downranks 65,000 Pirate Sites in Search Results
#182I would prefer that Google would add labels like "pirate site" or "legitimate copy". How can a normal user understand what kind of site they are visiting and whether the site has a legal copy of a movie? The copyright agreements are not public. For example, there is a website that allows to watch Japanese TV from abroad (quite expensive by the way). How one can be sure that they are not paying to scammers?
Yeah, I experienced this problem hardcore when trying to find an ebook I wanted to buy DRM-free. You search for that and you get a ton of PDF sharing sites. As it turned out, it was hard to find a legit link there because the publisher didn't offer any DRM free options, mind you. But yeah, when I was looking for a proper way to purchase, all I found was pirate versions.
Re: Google Downranks 65,000 Pirate Sites in Search Results
#183Earlier quoted context omitted.
I run all such queries in a dedicated Linux VM so that I visit any "strange" websites only in that VM. I use a browser not connected to my (sync) account and don't login to any of my usual websites. uBlock Origin with all kinds of lists enabled is on, uMatrix is installed but it was too much of a hassle so it remains disabled. I hope my feeling of relative safety is justified, but I'm not a security expert(?). PS: Be…
I wonder if I am doing too little in comparison? I just use incognito and adblock. My impression is that whenever there's a remote code execution bug in chrome it becomes big news (ex: Meltdown/Spectre) so usually I can just trust the browser sandbox. Surely anyone with an exploit that can break the sandbox would use it on high value target rather than wasting it on the mass and having it get patched quickly? I think…
The dangerous ones are precisely the ones you don't know about.
Re: Google Downranks 65,000 Pirate Sites in Search Results
#184Earlier quoted context omitted.
So I was looking for an older movie a while back, not even necessarily to pirate but just if it was available anywhere. Tons of results on YouTube that were just hiurbking clips with a frame that said check description for url. Amazing google can’t stop those but they can do things like demobilize lgbt content.
What does this verb mean in this context, "demobilize"?
Re: Google Downranks 65,000 Pirate Sites in Search Results
#185I often find that Google sends me to scam sites like Elsevier instead of Library Genesis or TPB when what I am searching for can be found there. Is there a better search engine out there that solves this problem?
Re: Google Downranks 65,000 Pirate Sites in Search Results
#186Is the 65k number an implementation detail? Like because of 16 bits or something?
Re: Google Downranks 65,000 Pirate Sites in Search Results
#187Earlier quoted context omitted.
How do you get around not being able to search email in protonmail? At least in the web client which is all I use in gmail.
You can actually search quite well in ProtonMail. Though it only searches some email headers (title, sender, receiver etc) and tags. Those are not stored encrypted. But it doesn't search the body of your emails.
Which is a massive limitation.
Re: Google Downranks 65,000 Pirate Sites in Search Results
#188I remember I used to do filetype searches for mp3, mp4, flac, etc... and get all sorts of good stuff. I would find ftp servers with thousands of songs and just download anything interesting. I feel like the Google search algorithm peaked many years ago and has gradually been neutered by all sorts of special interest groups who have no doubt harassed Google with legal threats. Google probably doesn't want to censor re…
It would be funny to see bing finally reach google search quality not because it got better, but because google got worse.
EDIT: Evidently you can right-click and view image. I thought that wouldn't get me to the original image since the image as presented in search is smaller in resolution than what Google says the image really is. Either way, in DDG the image actually links to the damn image and not to the site where the image supposedly maybe appears on.
Re: Google Downranks 65,000 Pirate Sites in Search Results
#189Earlier quoted context omitted.
Source? Wouldn't these people need to be specifically from the search team, and not Google in general (which would have almost no control over search)
Google keeps on demoting sites in search for doing certain things. In the past, this has largely been good. This stance against piracy and the stance that YouTube has taken against the principles of free speech mark a trajectory I find disturbing.
Re: Google Downranks 65,000 Pirate Sites in Search Results
#190How often are pirates just starting with google anyway? I suspect most folks searching really do want a legit copy.