"exposes" here is quite a strange term, because their entire business is selling that same data. The only difference is that it was briefly available without a price tag.
At least without the leak they have the option to refuse.
91–100 of 307 posts
"exposes" here is quite a strange term, because their entire business is selling that same data. The only difference is that it was briefly available without a price tag.
At least without the leak they have the option to refuse.
I think the antithesis of would be information redistribution. Everybody should be entitled to access all of this information if anyone has it. Just for fun lets say the only caveat is that all information access is also public and linked to each identity.
Do you think its better off in the hands of the highest bidders???
When will this stop? When's the last straw? If I gave a bank 100 dollars, and they lost it, I'd have avenues with which to pursue some sort of justice. If I give a company my data, and they lose it, oh well. I wish all personal data was treated like HIPAA, at a minimum.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> what's the alternative? Absolute liability for data losses. Exactis lost 360 million peoples' data. They should be able to (a) form a class and (b) extract money damages from Exactis without having to prove specific harm, which is difficult to do with data loss. A good model is Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act [1]. Broaden the the definition from "biometric identifier" to a longer--but still specific--li…
That's basically what GDPR does. It broadens the scope of what is considered sensitive info and slaps a fine on people PRIOR to a breach. If a breach is found, then any breach of GDPR means EU can come after that company and hurt them seriously.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm suggesting that the alternative is a modification of the GDPR. It has a lot of great aspects, and some aspects that are kinda terrible.
It seems like the biggest issue with GDPR is that it’s comes from Europe and not the US? Historically speaking, Europe has in many issues come to agreement on technically solutions and industrial standards many years ahead of the US. For example, Europe was first on texting on the mobile network while the US (single country) took years to come to a standard. I think it will be the same with regards to GDPR. You (US)…
I still can't understand why leaking SSN should do me harms. These are primary key, not crediential. But everybody is treating them as crediential.
When will this stop? When's the last straw? If I gave a bank 100 dollars, and they lost it, I'd have avenues with which to pursue some sort of justice. If I give a company my data, and they lose it, oh well. I wish all personal data was treated like HIPAA, at a minimum.
Same flawed logic as in online piracy. No one lost your data, they still have it, but someone else made a copy.
The pedantism is unhelpful.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Let's discuss how we can fix this. I'm actually considering leaving my job of 8 years for a probably to be doomed privacy startup. Either way, I'm interested in solutions and more importantly working towards them, even for free.
Figure out a way to make the data collected useless. You can't hide and block every attempt to track, collect and generally have your privacy invaded. But it may be possible to throw a wrench in the gears by making so much noise the data is low quality.
This is laughable. Data security is a fairy-tale. We've all been bought and sold and there is nothing any of us can do to fix it.
spoiler alert: nobody goes to jail.