Pagination Is Dead
trevore.com
Pagination Is Dead
1–10 of 22 posts
Re: Pagination Is Dead
#2Re: Pagination Is Dead
#3Pagination is good because you know how many pages do you have ...
Maybe what is needed is a very good search engine!
Re: Pagination Is Dead
#4I do not miss Google Search at all!
Re: Pagination Is Dead
#5I like pagination because it provides stop points to the time sink. Infinite scrolling works too well for sucking people's attention indefinitely.
Re: Pagination Is Dead
#6Re: Pagination Is Dead
#7Infinite scrolls are some time exhausting, because there is never an end ... Pagination is good because you know how many pages do you have ... Maybe what is needed is a very good search engine!
Re: Pagination Is Dead
#8Also, I hate pagination in almost every case.
Re: Pagination Is Dead
#9From a technical perspective, in many cases getting the total count required for formal pagination is actually extremely tricky. Even in postgres, the count operation on an indexed table is extremely slow. In cases where the query is doing something more complicated than hitting an RDBMS, getting the total count could be substantially more complicated. Also, I hate pagination in almost every case.
Re: Pagination Is Dead
#10Particularly when you want to skip towards the end of the list. YouTube has recently changed all their playlists etc to infinite scroll and it takes FOREVER to scroll 5 pages down to get to the bottom of the list. And they don't have a UI to reverse the list order or jump ahead.
They did recently add a list reverse to some places but it's still missing in others. Drives me bonkers :(
Of course it's not necessarily purely the fault of infinite scroll, there are potentially ways to combine them. But the basic pattern many places implement is painful for this latency and no skip-ahead combination.