Live data from Hacker News

Don't Provide Your References to a Recruiter Until After Your Last Interview

kvonhorn.github.io

11–20 of 231 posts

Re: Don't Provide Your References to a Recruiter Until After Your Last Interview

#11
Being a contractor in the UK for the last 13 years i quickly learned when i first started that any recruiter that asks for references before they've even sent the CV to the client is a lying cheating scumbag and will get told outright where to go.

All they are doing it looking for leads.

Re: Don't Provide Your References to a Recruiter Until After Your Last Interview

#12
post #6

On the topic of the first one, am I the only one who finds it strange that a recruiter could 'poach' one of your references? I mean, maybe I'm unusual or it works differently over here, but from what I hear, most people's references in the UK seem to be managers or business owners for the companies they worked with, not the normal employees. Do people usually give their 'normal' colleagues as references in the US?

If you've been working at a large company for several years, there may be very few people outside your company who know your work well enough to give a meaningful reference. Then, you can't give a manager's name, since they will almost certainly tell your own manager what is going on. That leaves only your co-workers.

Re: Don't Provide Your References to a Recruiter Until After Your Last Interview

#13

What do you do when the recruiter contacts your current employer before you even provide references?

File a complaint with whatever firm they work for. Reassure your employer you're just keeping an ear to the ground.

Re: Don't Provide Your References to a Recruiter Until After Your Last Interview

#14
post #12
post #6

On the topic of the first one, am I the only one who finds it strange that a recruiter could 'poach' one of your references? I mean, maybe I'm unusual or it works differently over here, but from what I hear, most people's references in the UK seem to be managers or business owners for the companies they worked with, not the normal employees. Do people usually give their 'normal' colleagues as references in the US?

If you've been working at a large company for several years, there may be very few people outside your company who know your work well enough to give a meaningful reference. Then, you can't give a manager's name, since they will almost certainly tell your own manager what is going on. That leaves only your co-workers.

Oh, you're talking about someone applying for a job and using a reference from their current company. I always thought people used references from companies they don't work at anymore.

Re: Don't Provide Your References to a Recruiter Until After Your Last Interview

#15
post #14
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you've been working at a large company for several years, there may be very few people outside your company who know your work well enough to give a meaningful reference. Then, you can't give a manager's name, since they will almost certainly tell your own manager what is going on. That leaves only your co-workers.

Oh, you're talking about someone applying for a job and using a reference from their current company. I always thought people used references from companies they don't work at anymore.

Yeah, for better or for worse that may be all a given candidate has.

Re: Don't Provide Your References to a Recruiter Until After Your Last Interview

#16
> I do know that my manager called me up pissed off about the phone call he’d received, and told me to not use him as a reference in the future.

It's also important for your references to know that they're your references ahead of time. You may think you have a good relationship with someone only to discover that they aren't a reliable positive reference. People also don't like being caught off guard.

Re: Don't Provide Your References to a Recruiter Until After Your Last Interview

#18
1) Your professional references may be better qualified for the role than you

This is pretty far fetched. Anyone who would be willing to go behind your back like that probably isn't someone you should list as a reference. Also nothing about being done with the last interview prevents the company from going behind your back like that anyway...

2) You’re giving the recruiter something of great value in exchange for very little

In my experience I have never seen house recruiters who add contact info for reference checks into the recruiting CRM. It seems like the kind of idea that sounds great/effective in theory but in practice is too much hassle. Maybe this only applies to 3rd party firms?

3) You may burn your references

I don't think you should ever hand out contact info for someone (email/phone #/etc) without clearing it with them first, full stop.

Re: Don't Provide Your References to a Recruiter Until After Your Last Interview

#19
post #15
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh, you're talking about someone applying for a job and using a reference from their current company. I always thought people used references from companies they don't work at anymore.

Yeah, for better or for worse that may be all a given candidate has.

In that case they should definitely avoid giving references until the last possible step. For those that do have other options though, I still think going with a manager/non colleague at a company you're not associated with anymore is the safer bet for these sorts of things, since recruiters won't have anyone to poach and your current boss won't know you're looking.

(Solution 2 would be to have as many different references as possible and to give different ones for different applications, so that no one gets too annoyed by all the calls/emails).

Re: Don't Provide Your References to a Recruiter Until After Your Last Interview

#20
post #7

Do people still check references? My last two gigs they didn't even bother.

It’s still worth doing even if there’s a just a small chance of turning something up. The only time I haven’t seen it be useful is employee referrals.
Post reply on HN