Facebook’s patents show a commitment to collecting personal information
31–40 of 173 posts
Re: Facebook’s patents show a commitment to collecting personal information
#32It's crazy how the large companies file so many patents for any idea their employees can think of. We used to have a lawyer come to our desks once a month and they would try patent any idea you could come up with even off the top of your head. Not sure how small companies can compete when larger companies can buy up all the IP in a space without having to do any work. The smaller companies I've worked for have to be…
Re: Facebook’s patents show a commitment to collecting personal information
#33Yet another New York Times hit piece against Facebook. It makes you wonder what a private corporation is supposed to do. In just this year: 1) The New York Times has published an endless stream editorials calling for Facebook to be destroyed [1], insisting Facebook is a thread to national security [2] and declaring Facebook a threat to the republic [3]. 2) These editorials are joined by "reporting" insinuating that F…
NYT's business model seems to have turned to latching on to whatever sentiment is currently popular and beating the metaphorical horse for clicks until it's a bloody pulp, before moving on to the latest "outrage" of the week. In fact, in catering to simply the loudest popular sentiment, they put themselves in the position of having to apologize for their recent election coverage due to how utterly biased it ended up…
Re: Facebook’s patents show a commitment to collecting personal information
#34You need data to build technologies of the future and continue improvement of living standards. We (Western countries) should make it as easy as possible to collect and share it between businesses, and embrace it culturally if we want to stay relevant in AI-powered future.
I have two arguments here.
1. The kind of data Facebook collects has nothing to do with AI, but advertising.
2. Even it mattered for AI, why do you think staying relevant in AI-powered future is more important than our privacy?
Re: Facebook’s patents show a commitment to collecting personal information
#35What is "server 112"? Is this some internet-ism I don't know about?
Re: Facebook’s patents show a commitment to collecting personal information
#36You need data to build technologies of the future and continue improvement of living standards. We (Western countries) should make it as easy as possible to collect and share it between businesses, and embrace it culturally if we want to stay relevant in AI-powered future.
Re: Facebook’s patents show a commitment to collecting personal information
#37Re: Facebook’s patents show a commitment to collecting personal information
#38I have to give it to FB - it's impressive how does their personal information collection and inference work. I was recently called by their recruiter - despite me being off FB for a few years, with inactive LinkedIn profile and keeping my current career info offline, they were perfectly informed what I am up to. Google messaged me as well. It's pretty amazing they could figure it out, even if I didn't really hide any…
Re: Facebook’s patents show a commitment to collecting personal information
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Where was this level of scrutiny before last year? Did fb turn evil in 2017.
Just because they didn't do something before why should they do it now? Is that really your argument?
Re: Facebook’s patents show a commitment to collecting personal information
#40You need data to build technologies of the future and continue improvement of living standards. We (Western countries) should make it as easy as possible to collect and share it between businesses, and embrace it culturally if we want to stay relevant in AI-powered future.