Live data from Hacker News

LibreOffice tells Oracle to fork off

documentfoundation.org

21–26 of 26 posts

Re: LibreOffice tells Oracle to fork off

#23
post #17

Is this legit ? as in, are there enough people from the original project's lead developers in here . I am considering donating to their development fund, so was wondering if it was just an overly ambitious project going nowhere.

This LWN article cites several big names announcing their support: http://lwn.net/Articles/407383/ RMS, DiBona from Google, Lunardi from Novell and even Mark Shuttleworth.

It's nice that Big Names are supporting it, but for it to survive, it needs actual developers who know the codebase. I believe the actual developers are what sandGordon was referring to.

Re: LibreOffice tells Oracle to fork off

#24
post #17

Is this legit ? as in, are there enough people from the original project's lead developers in here . I am considering donating to their development fund, so was wondering if it was just an overly ambitious project going nowhere.

This LWN article cites several big names announcing their support: http://lwn.net/Articles/407383/ RMS, DiBona from Google, Lunardi from Novell and even Mark Shuttleworth.

Chris is here from time to time.

Re: LibreOffice tells Oracle to fork off

#26
post #13

I never understood why I couldn't find an OO fork that trimmed all the fat, took a "Google approach", and tried to be really good at basic word processing. This includes elements like an uncluttered UI, responsiveness of pagination, collaborative editing, better fonts and design templates, maybe even web storage integration. Think college students and their needs, as a way of feeding into the next generation. Instead…

Abiword?
Post reply on HN