It's quite incredible how the web managed to get along with such a janky sandbox model. It's a very important thing that users trust their browser and won't hesitate a second to enter an unknown URL. They see "going to a webpage" as the equivalent to looking at a poster in the street, not eating candy provided by a random stranger. Eroding this trust would ruin it for everyone, even well behaved static websites witho…
I discovered a browser bug
101–110 of 137 posts
Re: I discovered a browser bug
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
well thanks for doing your best to ensure they stop engaging on HN, i guess...
Tell me a better way to get Google to fix things, I'm all ears. Complaining in social media, bugging people you know inside the walls and calling them out here works
The fact that you haven't found a good way to get Google to fix things for you isn't an excuse to just charge forward with the best way that you have found.
Suppose you're stuck in traffic. The most effective way to move forward might really be to just lay on your horn. The people in front of you will probably eventually yield (most just eager to put distance between themselves & you, others generously assuming that you have some kind of emergency). That doesn't make it okay for you to do that.
The second time you had the wrong attitude is when you demanded that people teach you a better way. Maybe somebody on HN will generously extend that favor to you, but if they do then realize that they've done you a favor -- they didn't owe it to you.
Re: I discovered a browser bug
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The single greatest web innovation in the last 30 years was readability mode. For you. From what I see, everyone else seems to be enjoying the dancing and singing monkeys online.
the monkeys[1] are enjoying themselves, dancing and singing, at the expense of everybody else. [1] web application pushers edit: hn "syntax"
Re: I discovered a browser bug
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you want to reinforce established monopolies? Because I can't think of a better way of doing that than having a technical difference between "trusted" and "untrusted" sites.
Aren't we sort of starting down that path already? IIRC Chrome only allows certain operations on HTTPS domains as of late such as webcam or microphone access. It seems like this sort of iterative securing of different things over time could be a good way to secure the web while also giving time for older sites to upgrade.
(Disclosure: I work at Google, though not on browsers)
Re: I discovered a browser bug
#105Re: I discovered a browser bug
#106Re: I discovered a browser bug
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
One can see a rationale in not having a security group - every team should have security focus (eg by having expertise & champions within each group). You can't tack on security, you have to build it in.
I think you need both. Same as I think you need i10n and a8y at both layers.
Re: I discovered a browser bug
#108Re: I discovered a browser bug
#109Re: I discovered a browser bug
#110I can echo his experience reporting browser bugs and provide my own reviews: Firefox - By far the best. Quick response, usually from engineers. If it's important the fix will be quick. Edge - No reply for months / years. When I've gotten replies back it's been to ask me to try with the current version. When I do and the bug still exists it goes back at the bottom of the queue it seems. Chrome - Somewhat of a mixed ba…