Certificates for localhost
151–157 of 157 posts
Re: Certificates for localhost
#152I’ve always liked the concept of a localhost’d web app talking back to a localhost web server. It seems like a great way to get the cross-platform ease of use of developing the UI without having to do everything in browser, so you can optimize the heavy lifting and don’t end up with an Electron app pulling 8Gb of RAM and 100% Of 16 cores. But I could never quite satisfy the nagging feeling that the localhost server c…
Single auth_code shared between web session and local app is all you need.
Re: Certificates for localhost
#153Re: Certificates for localhost
#154Earlier quoted context omitted.
They get one private key per user, and send it to the client's device.
Which "compromises" the key, according to current Certificate Authorities policies. Once again the problem boils down to CAs being the sole "anchors of trust" in the current certificate system.
Re: Certificates for localhost
#155Earlier quoted context omitted.
How would you run a local HTTPS server without the private key?
They get one private key per user, and send it to the client's device.
Re: Certificates for localhost
#156Is it time to start using a better acronym than either XHR or AJAX? Is there a modern accurate alternative for an HTTP request made by a browser that is not a request for a page reload?
Re: Certificates for localhost
#157Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I’ve always liked the concept of a localhost’d web app talking back to a localhost web server. We're doing exactly this prime-time with Relica: https://relicabackup.com (sorry, not much on the landing page yet, but we have emailed out some info about the UI already [1]). That technique will allow us to distribute backup software that works the same for macOS, Linux, BSD, and Windows, right away; screenshot: [2]. An…
Thank you, yes, I think architecturally there are great advantages to splitting up an app like a client/server even when designed primarily to be accessed over localhost. Obviously the “server” API is extremely sensitive and I think you have to assume it is effectively exposed to the outside world, even with a 127.0.0.1 binding and a firewall. I guess if you make localhost users literally login and establish a sessio…