A Problem That Only Quantum Computers Will Ever Be Able to Solve
quantamagazine.org
A Problem That Only Quantum Computers Will Ever Be Able to Solve
1–10 of 41 posts
Re: A Problem That Only Quantum Computers Will Ever Be Able to Solve
#2Re: A Problem That Only Quantum Computers Will Ever Be Able to Solve
#3This is basically the TCS version of a clickbait headline. It's a separation of BQP and PH by an oracle. Certainly a nice result, but to put it into context, we also have a separation of P and NP by an oracle. Yet, we are very far away from actually proving that P and NP are distinct.
Re: A Problem That Only Quantum Computers Will Ever Be Able to Solve
#4P means solvable in polynomial time relative to the size of the problem, which could still take longer than the universe has existed
Re: A Problem That Only Quantum Computers Will Ever Be Able to Solve
#5This is basically the TCS version of a clickbait headline. It's a separation of BQP and PH by an oracle. Certainly a nice result, but to put it into context, we also have a separation of P and NP by an oracle. Yet, we are very far away from actually proving that P and NP are distinct.
Re: A Problem That Only Quantum Computers Will Ever Be Able to Solve
#6This is basically the TCS version of a clickbait headline. It's a separation of BQP and PH by an oracle. Certainly a nice result, but to put it into context, we also have a separation of P and NP by an oracle. Yet, we are very far away from actually proving that P and NP are distinct.
Re: A Problem That Only Quantum Computers Will Ever Be Able to Solve
#7This is basically the TCS version of a clickbait headline. It's a separation of BQP and PH by an oracle. Certainly a nice result, but to put it into context, we also have a separation of P and NP by an oracle. Yet, we are very far away from actually proving that P and NP are distinct.
We need to do something about clickbait.
Re: A Problem That Only Quantum Computers Will Ever Be Able to Solve
#8 Imagine you have two random number generators, each
producing a sequence of digits. The question for your
computer is this: Are the two sequences completely
independent from each other, or are they related in a
hidden way?
That, right there, should tell absolutely everyone, by intuition alone, that, despite assurances from industry experts that flaws leading to breaks (plain-text discovery faster than brute force) are universally impractical, even with all the energy of a dyson sphere, that there are classified equations for back doors baked into all modern, commercially used civilian/consumer-grade cryptographic algorithms.Re: A Problem That Only Quantum Computers Will Ever Be Able to Solve
#9This is basically the TCS version of a clickbait headline. It's a separation of BQP and PH by an oracle. Certainly a nice result, but to put it into context, we also have a separation of P and NP by an oracle. Yet, we are very far away from actually proving that P and NP are distinct.
Any time I hear something sensational about quantum computing, I check Scott Aaronson's blog for the real story. Here's his blog post on this topic: https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=3827 .
> Since (despite my journalist moratorium) a journalist already emailed to ask me about the practical implications of the BQP vs. PH breakthrough—for example, for the ~70-qubit quantum computers that Google and others hope to build in the near future—let me take the opportunity to say that, as far as I can see, there aren’t any.
Re: A Problem That Only Quantum Computers Will Ever Be Able to Solve
#10I don't know much about this subject, so I'm assuming one of my assumptions is wrong.