Live data from Hacker News

Neanderthal ‘minibrains’ grown in dish

sciencemag.org

21–30 of 55 posts

Re: Neanderthal ‘minibrains’ grown in dish

#21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

dunno man... expecting a neanderthal brain to crisply repeat a four syllable word is a bit much...

That word may be just an audio file in the robot's memory, that is played back when a single particular neuron fires.

Ex-ter-mi-nate!

Re: Neanderthal ‘minibrains’ grown in dish

#24
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Descartes never married, but he did have a daughter, Francine, born in the Netherlands in 1635. https://www.biography.com/people/ren-descartes-37613 Not sure if the rest is credible...

It might be a misunderstanding. In many languages, there is one commonly used word that translates (out of context) to "wife", "unmarried partner" and "woman" at the same time.

אישה

That's the word the Bible uses for Eve. It means all three words, as you've mentioned. Being biblical, this form of speech is not uncommon in many European and Middle Eastern cultures and languages.

Re: Neanderthal ‘minibrains’ grown in dish

#26

Is this ethical?

Could you elaborate? What part do you find to be unethical and for what reasons? What alternate ethical studies do you recommend to gain the same information being gained here?

That wasn't a rhetorical question. I'm genuinely curious if this is ethical or not.

Re: Neanderthal ‘minibrains’ grown in dish

#27
>>> "We're trying to recreate Neanderthal minds," Muotri says."

Get the pitchforks. This scientist has gone too far. Really. I'm a totally against growing "minds" in jars. I'd be against doing this with any animal brain, let alone something functionally equivalent to human. There are ethical lines that shouldn't be crossed. The concept of a non-corporeal mind living a non-sensory existence in a jar of goo is too horrible to be allowed. This nightmare should live only in the pages of science fiction.

Re: Neanderthal ‘minibrains’ grown in dish

#28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It might be a misunderstanding. In many languages, there is one commonly used word that translates (out of context) to "wife", "unmarried partner" and "woman" at the same time.

אישה That's the word the Bible uses for Eve. It means all three words, as you've mentioned. Being biblical, this form of speech is not uncommon in many European and Middle Eastern cultures and languages.

Further reading: Helena Jans van der Strom

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francine_Descartes

Re: Neanderthal ‘minibrains’ grown in dish

#29

Obviously this is a long, long way from a functional brain being grown. But I have to wonder where the moral line is drawn when you're talking about growing an organ that (may-or-may-not) hold the ability to form a level of consciousness.

The quick answer is to say it's not ethical. But what if the brain is given full autonomy and ability to communicate with others and then let the brain decide if it wants an organic or machine body?

Re: Neanderthal ‘minibrains’ grown in dish

#30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

אישה That's the word the Bible uses for Eve. It means all three words, as you've mentioned. Being biblical, this form of speech is not uncommon in many European and Middle Eastern cultures and languages.

Further reading: Helena Jans van der Strom https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francine_Descartes

(edited to match parent) Her mother was Helena Jens, and she was already married to another man at the period this article talks about. Descartes was also back in France while she was still in the Netherlands.

Although Descartes did vivisect animals for research purposes, I think it's safe to say that this particular account is an invention.

Post reply on HN