Live data from Hacker News

Improved JavaScript and WebAssembly performance in EdgeHTML 17

blogs.windows.com

21–30 of 112 posts

Re: Improved JavaScript and WebAssembly performance in EdgeHTML 17

#21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Edge is the most resource efficient and respects modern Windows conventions, therefore it has the best, pen, touchscreen, tablet (including share button and stuff) and precision trackpad support. And since it's WinRT/UWP, it can suspends its tab processes, and also itself when minimized or automatically during tablet mode in the background, and during fullscreen it also automatically unhides the taskbar when you hove…

> Edge is on both iOS Well, not really. It exists on iOS the same way Chrome and Firefox exist on iOS: as frontends for iOS's WebKit engine.

And?

Re: Improved JavaScript and WebAssembly performance in EdgeHTML 17

#22

I've never seen a person using Edge. Does anyone here use it? Do you work at Microsoft or have a big technical investment in their technology? Do you find the lack of cross-platform support annoying, or do you primarily use a single OS? These changes all look like they apply to ChakraCore, which is open source and available outside of Windows. I'd be curious to hear what kinds of use-cases people have for using Node…

My manager insists on using Edge because "it is the default browser on Windows so everybody uses it".

I'm working on an in-house Angular application, and he has discovered a lot of compatibility issues that none of our other users have.

Re: Improved JavaScript and WebAssembly performance in EdgeHTML 17

#23

I've never seen a person using Edge. Does anyone here use it? Do you work at Microsoft or have a big technical investment in their technology? Do you find the lack of cross-platform support annoying, or do you primarily use a single OS? These changes all look like they apply to ChakraCore, which is open source and available outside of Windows. I'd be curious to hear what kinds of use-cases people have for using Node…

Edge is the most resource efficient and respects modern Windows conventions, therefore it has the best, pen, touchscreen, tablet (including share button and stuff) and precision trackpad support. And since it's WinRT/UWP, it can suspends its tab processes, and also itself when minimized or automatically during tablet mode in the background, and during fullscreen it also automatically unhides the taskbar when you hove…

> Edge is on both iOS and Android,

Something called Edge from Microsoft is available for iOS (where it is a rebranded WebKit) and on Android (where it is a rebranded Blink, IIRC). If you primarily work with Windows 10, Edge makes some sense, otherwise it makes no sense.

On iPhone, by Apple decree, ALL web browsers (including Firefox and Chrome) are rebranded WebKit; However, on Android, Chrome is (mostly) the real chrome and Firefox is (mostly) the real firefox.

> I just value proper modern OS integration and battery efficiency, so that I can use my device as intended.

The only downside to it I see is that you are using Windows 10... I value privacy and control of my devices a little more than 10% of battery efficiency.

Re: Improved JavaScript and WebAssembly performance in EdgeHTML 17

#24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Edge is on both iOS Well, not really. It exists on iOS the same way Chrome and Firefox exist on iOS: as frontends for iOS's WebKit engine.

And?

...and that's like slapping a custom badge on a Ford Fiesta and calling it a Ferrari.

You're other points are much more interesting though. One of my biggest gripes with the other leading browsers is they often feel "foreign" on your host OS (which isn't Windows in my case, but that is just personal preference).

Re: Improved JavaScript and WebAssembly performance in EdgeHTML 17

#25

I've never seen a person using Edge. Does anyone here use it? Do you work at Microsoft or have a big technical investment in their technology? Do you find the lack of cross-platform support annoying, or do you primarily use a single OS? These changes all look like they apply to ChakraCore, which is open source and available outside of Windows. I'd be curious to hear what kinds of use-cases people have for using Node…

Every day, my day is spent across Edge, Chrome and Firefox.

Regarding OS, I am 90% of my time on Windows as development platform.

Re: Improved JavaScript and WebAssembly performance in EdgeHTML 17

#27

I've never seen a person using Edge. Does anyone here use it? Do you work at Microsoft or have a big technical investment in their technology? Do you find the lack of cross-platform support annoying, or do you primarily use a single OS? These changes all look like they apply to ChakraCore, which is open source and available outside of Windows. I'd be curious to hear what kinds of use-cases people have for using Node…

Whenever I try Cortana I 'use' Edge because Microsoft completely ignores the default browser here. Then I quickly deactivate Cortana.

Re: Improved JavaScript and WebAssembly performance in EdgeHTML 17

#28
post #18

Two things on my wishlist as a developer: 1. Decoupling Edge updates from Windows updates for quicker adoption. 2. Custom Elements as the basic feature for Web Components.

Giving the push for PWAs and access to UWP APIs from PWAs available via the store I think at least 1 might happen.

Re: Improved JavaScript and WebAssembly performance in EdgeHTML 17

#29
post #22

I've never seen a person using Edge. Does anyone here use it? Do you work at Microsoft or have a big technical investment in their technology? Do you find the lack of cross-platform support annoying, or do you primarily use a single OS? These changes all look like they apply to ChakraCore, which is open source and available outside of Windows. I'd be curious to hear what kinds of use-cases people have for using Node…

My manager insists on using Edge because "it is the default browser on Windows so everybody uses it". I'm working on an in-house Angular application, and he has discovered a lot of compatibility issues that none of our other users have.

...or possibly other users have discovered but not bothered to report it?

Your manager is doing the right thing here - even if you don't agree with his rational. If you don't control the browsers your customers* use then you should be testing your application on as many unique platforms as you can. That is essentially UAT 101.

* "customers" might be external to the company, or your own staff if you're developing an intranet application.

Re: Improved JavaScript and WebAssembly performance in EdgeHTML 17

#30
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And?

...and that's like slapping a custom badge on a Ford Fiesta and calling it a Ferrari. You're other points are much more interesting though. One of my biggest gripes with the other leading browsers is they often feel "foreign" on your host OS (which isn't Windows in my case, but that is just personal preference).

No, it's like slapping a custom badge over a Ford Fiesta platform's B3, re-do completely the interior, add some smart features around it. Hell, even do some kind of smart auto-assist while you are on it.

You keep the engine and the architecture around it but add your own luxuries and niceties.

Post reply on HN