Live data from Hacker News

Harvard Rated Asian-American Applicants Lower on Personality Traits: Lawsuit

nytimes.com

81–90 of 166 posts

Re: Harvard Rated Asian-American Applicants Lower on Personality Traits: Lawsuit

#81
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Of course they do. Consider this research: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/04/09/new-research-... Among elite Universities that initially do a holistic review of applicants to narrow down the applicant pool, URM status is viewed as the most important factor for an applicant by 42% of the universities, equal to the number of schools that view "exceptional talent" as the most important factor. Being a URM is b…

> Look up average SAT scores of different ethnic groups admitted to elite colleges as well. The disparity is glaring. Yes, everybody appeals to SAT scores. SAT scores are easily gamed. That's why more and more colleges are deprioritizing or abandoning them completely. What American colleges are increasingly uninterested in are excellent test-takers. Nobody is persuaded that students who are able to grind out excellen…

“Research suggests that the SAT, widely used in college admissions, is primarily a measure of g. A correlation of .82 has been found between g scores computed from an IQ test battery and SAT scores. In a study of 165,000 students at 41 U.S. colleges, SAT scores were found to be correlated at .47 with first-year college grade-point average after correcting for range restriction in SAT scores (the correlation rises to .55 when course difficulty is held constant, i.e., if all students attended the same set of classes). [1][2]”

[1] Sackett et al. 2008

[2] Frey & Detterman 2003

Re: Harvard Rated Asian-American Applicants Lower on Personality Traits: Lawsuit

#82

There may be racial differences in personality, but it is implausible that as the proportion of Asians in the high-achieving student population rises, their personalities get just worse enough that the fraction of Asian students at Harvard stays about the same. Harvard admits this when it says that what brings the Asian fraction down to 18% is "demographic". Elite universities are often accusing the broader society o…

What always gets lost in this debate though is the fact that grades and SAT scores aren't especially meaningful or important. Given that we've had Asians and Jews freaking out all week and making dogwhistle attacks against blacks/hispanics because of the Stuy admissions issue, the fact that these so-called metrics aren't inherently any better or more fair than a personality test or whatever somehow always gets lost i…

“Research suggests that the SAT, widely used in college admissions, is primarily a measure of g. A correlation of .82 has been found between g scores computed from an IQ test battery and SAT scores. In a study of 165,000 students at 41 U.S. colleges, SAT scores were found to be correlated at .47 with first-year college grade-point average after correcting for range restriction in SAT scores (the correlation rises to .55 when course difficulty is held constant, i.e., if all students attended the same set of classes). [1][2]”

[1] Sackett et al. 2008

[2] Frey & Detterman 2003

Re: Harvard Rated Asian-American Applicants Lower on Personality Traits: Lawsuit

#83

There may be racial differences in personality, but it is implausible that as the proportion of Asians in the high-achieving student population rises, their personalities get just worse enough that the fraction of Asian students at Harvard stays about the same. Harvard admits this when it says that what brings the Asian fraction down to 18% is "demographic". Elite universities are often accusing the broader society o…

Look no further than this video. Hispanic and Black populations in USA are consistently painting themselves as victims. As a result there are many Hispanic and Black organisations focused activism and their membership counts as "personality development" at Harvard. Asian students on other hand are busy getting successful instead of painting themselves as victims. How an Indian student faked to be African American and…

It's hard to determine if this comment is racist or just ignorant. If it wasn't 2018 I would give you the benefit of the doubt and assume it was just ignorant.

"Asian students on other hand are busy getting successful"

What does that mean? How do I get successful? It's a thing I can just will into existence? When you so profoundly reduce success to something a person can just "get" you're painting a picture of a level playing field on which everyone plays. There's loads, and loads, and loads.....and loads more of studies, books, theory, film, music, poetry that all very clearly articulate systemic inequalities that make it difficult for a person to just simply "get successful". There are good conversations on HN about this very point. If you truly feel Hispanic and Black populations are painting themselves as victims in a way that doesn't reflect their reality I urge you to spend time talking to people from these groups. Get to know them, ask them their stories, learn about their families, have meals with them and understand them. Read about Hispanic and Black civil rights movements and struggles and see what of your beliefs come out on the other side.

Re: Harvard Rated Asian-American Applicants Lower on Personality Traits: Lawsuit

#84

I guess the more woolly selection criteria are there so that racial discrimination can be conducted, otherwise the student population would be overwhelmingly asian with a large white minority?

Nah it would be more like UC Berkeley, which is forbidden from using racial quotas by California law. Still less than half Asian.

In fact the Asian numbers at Berkeley are probably inflated due to Asian students being discriminated against elsewhere (like Harvard) and going to Berkeley instead, so if all the universities stopped discriminating, the numbers would average out to lower than Berkeley's current demographic.

Re: Harvard Rated Asian-American Applicants Lower on Personality Traits: Lawsuit

#85
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Studies have shown grades and test scores are predictive of college graduation rates and grades. College grades and graduation rates don't matter either though. Given that society has limited resources, we should be trying to give the best educations to those most likely to do stuff that contributes positively to society, not those who are most likely to spend their four years maximizing their GPA and those most li…

How do you identify individuals who are "most likely to do stuff that contributes positively to society"? How do you define "positively to society"?

> How do you identify individuals who are "most likely to do stuff that contributes positively to society"?

I think the basic things to look for are people who have some combination of:

- Basic awareness of what's going on locally, nationally, and around the world, and the problems that society faces.

- Technical skills (e.g. math, science, the active literacies, etc.)

- Interpersonal skills, leadership ability, grit, resourcefulness, and other positive personality traits.

- Passion of certain hobbies, interests, problems, etc.

- Track record of success in one or more areas.

- Culture literacy

In other words, leaving aside the issue of whether or not they're using these criteria as a way to discriminate, what Harvard is ostensibly looking for today.

> How do you define "positively to society"?

That's really up to the school faculty. Each person's definition is going to be different, and you can't really impose something on people from on high.

Re: Harvard Rated Asian-American Applicants Lower on Personality Traits: Lawsuit

#86
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Studies have shown grades and test scores are predictive of college graduation rates and grades. College grades and graduation rates don't matter either though. Given that society has limited resources, we should be trying to give the best educations to those most likely to do stuff that contributes positively to society, not those who are most likely to spend their four years maximizing their GPA and those most li…

How do you identify individuals who are "most likely to do stuff that contributes positively to society"? How do you define "positively to society"?

Isn't that in part why outside activities are a thing at prestige universities. Like doing voluntary work, raising money for charity, managing a project which specifically targets people in need (ie. 3d printable implants or small mesh devices with disaster aftermath in mind)

Re: Harvard Rated Asian-American Applicants Lower on Personality Traits: Lawsuit

#87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What always gets lost in this debate though is the fact that grades and SAT scores aren't especially meaningful or important. Given that we've had Asians and Jews freaking out all week and making dogwhistle attacks against blacks/hispanics because of the Stuy admissions issue, the fact that these so-called metrics aren't inherently any better or more fair than a personality test or whatever somehow always gets lost i…

“Research suggests that the SAT, widely used in college admissions, is primarily a measure of g. A correlation of .82 has been found between g scores computed from an IQ test battery and SAT scores. In a study of 165,000 students at 41 U.S. colleges, SAT scores were found to be correlated at .47 with first-year college grade-point average after correcting for range restriction in SAT scores (the correlation rises to…

> widely used in college admissions

You need to correct for the fact that it's used in college admissions though, otherwise this isn't telling you anything.

E.g. if tree identification were used as the basis for college admissions, within a couple years you'd find that the people who did the best in college were the ones who were the best at identifying trees.

Re: Harvard Rated Asian-American Applicants Lower on Personality Traits: Lawsuit

#88
post #11

I can't help but think that college admissions based solely on test scores (as done in India, Russia, maybe China?), and nothing else, might be the least unfair way to judge applicants. Every admission system is unfair in some way but tests are a yardstick everyone understands and can optimize for. In India they publicly post the list of admitted students and their marks. Richer students may benefit from higher-quali…

I don't know much about the Indian system but what is missed in the discussion is that Harvard is NOT a technical university - it is a liberal arts program, and as such, one would expect a broader set of admission criteria than some other institutions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_arts_education

Re: Harvard Rated Asian-American Applicants Lower on Personality Traits: Lawsuit

#89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why do you assume that Asians are only good at posting test scores and grades? Those scores are being talked about because of all the criteria they are the measurable ones, so you can use them as a baseline. Asian Americans do extracurricular activities just like everyone else does.

> Why do you assume that Asians are only good at posting test scores and grades? Not something I said or implied. I was purely talking about the responses to the NYC admissions thing on Facebook, the NYC subreddit, etc. > Those scores are being talked about because of all the criteria they are the measurable ones They're not measurable, they just have numbers attached to them. You can attach numbers to a personality…

Two people solving a maths problem draw upon a system of acquired knowledge that is uncorrelated with their gender, age, ethnicity and sexual orientation. If they get identical answers, they are graded identically.

>You can attach numbers to a personality test just as easily.

Please, do propose this novel test. Shouldn't take you too long..

Re: Harvard Rated Asian-American Applicants Lower on Personality Traits: Lawsuit

#90
post #11

I can't help but think that college admissions based solely on test scores (as done in India, Russia, maybe China?), and nothing else, might be the least unfair way to judge applicants. Every admission system is unfair in some way but tests are a yardstick everyone understands and can optimize for. In India they publicly post the list of admitted students and their marks. Richer students may benefit from higher-quali…

Single-gate protocols reward investment in gate-deception.

Any examples that are applicable here?
Post reply on HN