So, You’ve Hired a Hacker (2016)
cjshayward.com
So, You’ve Hired a Hacker (2016)
1–10 of 31 posts
Re: So, You’ve Hired a Hacker (2016)
#2Reminds me of Alan Kay statements regarding 'new ways to kill the geese that lay golden eggs' (previous HN discussion)
Re: So, You’ve Hired a Hacker (2016)
#3None of the words used to describe the hacker category applies to me or any hackers I know in real life. The manager description is much better for your average hacker, especially the bits about morality, and forgetting about how other people can be different from them.
Re: So, You’ve Hired a Hacker (2016)
#4Maybe more appropriate for this audience is the companion piece “Manager FAQ”: http://www.seebs.net/faqs/manager.html
Re: So, You’ve Hired a Hacker (2016)
#5HN hug of death.
Archive: https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https:...
Re: So, You’ve Hired a Hacker (2016)
#6> IBM used to report that certain programmers might be as much as 100 times as productive as other workers, or more. This kind of thing happens.
yeah, but that report is worthless, in context.
This whole article seems like it was written by someone who is still attending high school.
Re: So, You’ve Hired a Hacker (2016)
#7None of the words used to describe the hacker category applies to me or any hackers I know in real life. The manager description is much better for your average hacker, especially the bits about morality, and forgetting about how other people can be different from them.
1) Find context to make this statement on reddit.
2) PM me.
3) Enjoy gold.
Re: So, You’ve Hired a Hacker (2016)
#8That manager description seems....off. ...Was this written by a manager?
The hacker description is very interesting though and reflects my experience mostly
Re: So, You’ve Hired a Hacker (2016)
#9All that bible crap turned me off. 'Religious' hackers are only fooling themselves. Religion is anti-hacker.
Re: So, You’ve Hired a Hacker (2016)
#10Generalisations never stand up to scrutiny and (like this article) tend to be a bit niave