Live data from Hacker News

Stephen King: Can a Novelist Be Too Productive? (2015)

nytimes.com

21–30 of 97 posts

Re: Stephen King: Can a Novelist Be Too Productive? (2015)

#22
post #21

> "Donna Tartt, one of the best American novelists to emerge in the last 50 years, has published just three novels since 1992. Jonathan Franzen, the only American novelist who is her equal." Pynchon. DeLillo. McCarthy. Roth... Edit: Morrison. Updike. Mailer...

I'd take Philip K Dick over all of them put together.

Re: Stephen King: Can a Novelist Be Too Productive? (2015)

#23
post #21

> "Donna Tartt, one of the best American novelists to emerge in the last 50 years, has published just three novels since 1992. Jonathan Franzen, the only American novelist who is her equal." Pynchon. DeLillo. McCarthy. Roth... Edit: Morrison. Updike. Mailer...

I'd take Philip K Dick over all of them put together.

Him too.

Re: Stephen King: Can a Novelist Be Too Productive? (2015)

#24
post #21

> "Donna Tartt, one of the best American novelists to emerge in the last 50 years, has published just three novels since 1992. Jonathan Franzen, the only American novelist who is her equal." Pynchon. DeLillo. McCarthy. Roth... Edit: Morrison. Updike. Mailer...

Roth didn’t emerge in the last 50 years (otherwise I’d agree with you).* I’ve enjoyed books by all six but I agree with King on this one. The Goldfinch was, page for page, probably the best reading experience I’ve ever had. I adore that book. Franzen is less lovable but undeniably talented and, for me at least, more fun to read than the people who influenced him (Pynchon, DeLillo, etc)

*edit: I didn’t read the quote carefully. Looks like he really is saying those two are the best American novelists, full stop. Bold and kind of interesting statement on King’s part.

Re: Stephen King: Can a Novelist Be Too Productive? (2015)

#25
post #15

I'm reminded of Lovecraft, who would use a thesaurus to pad his paid-by-the-word word counts by inserting various adjectives that sounded scary but didn't actually mean anything in context.

I hadn't heard the postulate "one being that the more one writes, the less remarkable one’s work is apt to be" before. I suppose that outside the world of the literary criticism, there's a bit of an opposite feeling: If you're great, you probably have a reasonably large body of work. A while back, a friend and I both bought a copy of the complete works of Lovecraft; a single volume. It's a pretty thick book, but I wa…

Curiously, while Lovecraft's works of fiction may fit in a single volume, his correspondence does not. It's estimated that he wrote over 100,000 letters -- one of the most prolific letter writers in history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._P._Lovecraft#Letters

Re: Stephen King: Can a Novelist Be Too Productive? (2015)

#26
post #21

> "Donna Tartt, one of the best American novelists to emerge in the last 50 years, has published just three novels since 1992. Jonathan Franzen, the only American novelist who is her equal." Pynchon. DeLillo. McCarthy. Roth... Edit: Morrison. Updike. Mailer...

Roth didn’t emerge in the last 50 years (otherwise I’d agree with you).* I’ve enjoyed books by all six but I agree with King on this one. The Goldfinch was, page for page, probably the best reading experience I’ve ever had. I adore that book. Franzen is less lovable but undeniably talented and, for me at least, more fun to read than the people who influenced him (Pynchon, DeLillo, etc) *edit: I didn’t read the quote…

I love Franzen. But not in a class by himself, at least not in a half-century.

Re: Stephen King: Can a Novelist Be Too Productive? (2015)

#27
post #21

> "Donna Tartt, one of the best American novelists to emerge in the last 50 years, has published just three novels since 1992. Jonathan Franzen, the only American novelist who is her equal." Pynchon. DeLillo. McCarthy. Roth... Edit: Morrison. Updike. Mailer...

I'd take Philip K Dick over all of them put together.

With few exceptions, genre fiction doesn't count as Serious Literature.

Re: Stephen King: Can a Novelist Be Too Productive? (2015)

#28
post #21

> "Donna Tartt, one of the best American novelists to emerge in the last 50 years, has published just three novels since 1992. Jonathan Franzen, the only American novelist who is her equal." Pynchon. DeLillo. McCarthy. Roth... Edit: Morrison. Updike. Mailer...

It's subjective.

Re: Stephen King: Can a Novelist Be Too Productive? (2015)

#29
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was wondering the same thing, so I read his book "On Writing" a few weeks ago. I figured there might be some good take-aways for writing software since there seems to be some skill overlap. Here are my (crappy) notes: * The golden rule: read a lot, write a lot. * Have a place for only writing and concentrating. Do nothing else there. * Everyone has an innate talent ceiling. A good writer won't progress beyond being…

> One thing that struck me is how much he reads. He had a list of suggested books to read in the back page, and there were probably hundreds Here's the list, from the ebook I have at least: - Abrahams, Peter: A Perfect Crime - Abrahams, Peter: Lights Out - Abrahams, Peter: Pressure Drop - Abrahams, Peter: Revolution #9 - Agee, James: A Death in the Family - Bakis, Kirsten: Lives of the Monster Dogs - Barker, Pat: Reg…

[deleted]

Re: Stephen King: Can a Novelist Be Too Productive? (2015)

#30
post #21

> "Donna Tartt, one of the best American novelists to emerge in the last 50 years, has published just three novels since 1992. Jonathan Franzen, the only American novelist who is her equal." Pynchon. DeLillo. McCarthy. Roth... Edit: Morrison. Updike. Mailer...

Pynchon - Born 1937, "V" published in 1963

DeLillo - Born 1936, published first short story in 1960, novel in 1971

McCarthy - Born 1933, first short story published 1959, novel 1965

Roth - Born 1933, won award for "Goodbye, Columbus" in 1959

Updike - Born 1932, first published in 50's and 60s

Morrison - Born 1931, first published in 1970

Mailer - Born 1923, first published in 1949

Remember that 50 years ago (from the time this was written) is 1965. Morrison is the only author you mentioned that doesn't have published works from before 50 years ago, and even then she still belongs to that same generation.

King wasn't trying to slight any of them. It's just really has been a very long time.

Edit: To compare, Tartt was born in 1963 and Franzen in 1959. I think this is really the generation he is referring to.

Post reply on HN