Live data from Hacker News

Lasik’s Risks Are Coming into Sharper Focus

nytimes.com

221–230 of 239 posts

Re: Lasik’s Risks Are Coming into Sharper Focus

#221
post #107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why is that?

Because it might dislocate the flap

But after months, the flap does settle back. So while it never heals the risk of rubbing your eyes dislocating the flap is rare.

Nevertheless, I do worry about this a lot.

Re: Lasik’s Risks Are Coming into Sharper Focus

#222
post #133
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My night vision is also significantly deteriorated. I can drive fine at night, as I can see lights and reflective surfaces just fine, but walking around at night is definitely more difficult, and sometimes concerning. I'd had issues with dry eyes for most of my adult life. When I was still wearing contacts, I had a doctor tell me it was likely that I wasn't blinking enough. It seemed silly to me at first, but then I…

Did you use any tricks to make yourselfs blink more? I'm going through the same, getting used to contacts, but I can't think of a way to learn myself this without setting a timer every 2 minutes or so - which is obviously not really an option.

Of course there's a software solution to this: http://eyedoc2020.blogspot.com/2017/03/best-apps-to-remind-y...

Re: Lasik’s Risks Are Coming into Sharper Focus

#223

I had LASIK a little over a year ago and it turned out very well for me, due in part to having a great doctor and due in large part to all of the research that I did before having the surgery. However, one thing I emphasize to everyone considering it is that (despite the marketing) it should be considered a major elective surgery with a possibility of serious complications, and that anyone considering it should weigh…

> I believe that negative outcomes are greater when someone goes to a "patient mill" vs a good doctor

The highest correlation to surgical success is number of that type of procedure performed by a surgeon. I'd be interested to see that research if you still have it.

Re: Lasik’s Risks Are Coming into Sharper Focus

#224

I find it extremely hard to believe he wasn't warned. I had PRK (in San Francisco) and had to sign my life away, was told over and over and over again about the dangers. Plus, 30 seconds on google and you get plenty of information. I see these sort of operations as like buying safety gear. You don't skimp on price... or doctor quality. I went to several places first and got evaluated and then made an informed choice.…

Mind sharing where in SF? I live in SF too. (my HN username @ gmail)

http://www.pacificvision.org/

The thing that sold me was that Dr. Faktorovich is well known in the industry and they use a newer version of the machine than other providers in SF.

Note: I get no referral credit, I also no longer live in the US.

Re: Lasik’s Risks Are Coming into Sharper Focus

#225

I had Lasik done at a university teaching hospital by a surgeon who had done thousands of surgeries. This was in 2003. Every follow-up was by a resident and then the full surgeon. I had significant dry eyes and blepharitis (probably from the dry eyes) for about 12-18 months. 15 years later, I can still see 20/20 in one eye and 20/25-30 in the other. I still occasionally have dry eyes and blepharitis. I wear glasses a…

FWIW I'm 58 and still have 20/15 vision with corrective lenses (yes I typically eat bushels of veggies and carrots too), but the fear of only having 20/20 vision or worse is why I never opted for LASIK.

I consider my night vision poor--but I thought that even when I was in my teens. My eyes have always been a bit light sensitive... IDK if the two are related.

Contact lenses? Nope. All the wetting solutions I tried blurred my vision, sure it was only for 15 or 20 minutes but that doesn't work with my lifestyle.

For me the risk was never worth it.

Re: Lasik’s Risks Are Coming into Sharper Focus

#228
Can we ban propaganda sites from HN? They are almost never focused on technology and the headlines are clickbait.

All "news" sites should be banned. Or you should allow breitbart stories too. They are all the same thing, propaganda for the far left or the far right.

Re: Lasik’s Risks Are Coming into Sharper Focus

#229

Can we ban propaganda sites from HN? They are almost never focused on technology and the headlines are clickbait. All "news" sites should be banned. Or you should allow breitbart stories too. They are all the same thing, propaganda for the far left or the far right.

This is a public health risk that doesn't get a lot of attention, as I see it. It's good to occasionally post stuff like this.

If it was a well-known/often-posted topic, however, then it's ok to consider what you suggest.

Post reply on HN