AT&T Cleared by Judge to Buy Time Warner
21–30 of 284 posts
Re: AT&T Cleared by Judge to Buy Time Warner
#22 Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim said in a statement the DOJ was "disappointed
with the Court's decision today. We continue to believe that the pay-TV market will be
less competitive and less innovative as a result of the proposed merger between AT&T and
Time Warner. We will closely review the Court's opinion and consider next steps in light
of our commitment to preserving competition for the benefit of American consumers."
[1]: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-time-warner-m-a-at-t/u-s-...[2]: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/judge-rules-on-att-time-warner-...
Re: AT&T Cleared by Judge to Buy Time Warner
#23Re: AT&T Cleared by Judge to Buy Time Warner
#24Re: AT&T Cleared by Judge to Buy Time Warner
#25I'm so glad the end of Net Neutrality has ushered in an era of unprecedented competition in the broadband market. EDIT: Yes, this acquisition is of the content division of Time Warner, not the ISP, which was previously acquired — by another broadband provider , mooting my general point how, again?
Is that correct? (I'm not familiar with the US broadband market)
Re: AT&T Cleared by Judge to Buy Time Warner
#26Why does the date on the article say 2016?
https://www.wsj.com/articles/judge-is-set-to-decide-whether-...
Re: AT&T Cleared by Judge to Buy Time Warner
#27Re: AT&T Cleared by Judge to Buy Time Warner
#28>to lead the next generation in innovation. Meanwhile I have 300k internet in Pasadena, CA. That's the fastest they offer. My roommate doesn't care and won't upgrade to Spectrum. Why is it whenever I read the above it means the opposite?
How much AT&T Time Warner stock does your roomate own?!
Re: AT&T Cleared by Judge to Buy Time Warner
#29Yet more media consolidation. And this one has the inherent conflicts of interest you get when a distributor buys out a producer. And of course the idea of protecting the public interest isn't a thing anymore in DC.
Re: AT&T Cleared by Judge to Buy Time Warner
#30Why does the date on the article say 2016?