Live data from Hacker News

Lasik’s Risks Are Coming into Sharper Focus

nytimes.com

61–70 of 239 posts

Re: Lasik’s Risks Are Coming into Sharper Focus

#61

Anyone here wear the contact lenses that reshape your eyes at night and then during the day you have corrected vision and no lenses? Mostly I don't mind glasses and contacts, but there are some activities I'd rather not have to rely on them.

This sounded pretty cool so I googled it. The proper name is Orthokeratology.

Re: Lasik’s Risks Are Coming into Sharper Focus

#62
had LASIK two years ago. dry eyes and starbursts quite a bit in the first 6 months, but the dryness is gone now and night time vision is good. I can live with very minor starbursts/halos at night that don't interfere with my vision vs having contacts or glasses. the procedure got me to 20/15 and I'm seeing more clarity than I ever did with glasses or contacts.

I was told about still requiring reading glasses when you hit a certain age because that's an entirely different condition and sometimes people confuse that with the procedure having failed them later.

Re: Lasik’s Risks Are Coming into Sharper Focus

#63
I've always been surprised that people are willing to do LASIK. Maybe I've just been very lucky with contacts, but I notice pretty much no life difference versus before I needed contacts or glasses, other than the need to find contact solution to store them in at night. Nowhere near inconvenient enough to get me to consider carving my eye up with lasers.

Re: Lasik’s Risks Are Coming into Sharper Focus

#64
post #58

I think this is a unique view, but I've come to appreciate nearsightedness. Partially because I like having the ability to soften the external world by removing my glasses (like wrapping myself in a warm fuzzy blanket), but even more so because it grants me the ability to see things near me in sharper focus than someone with 20/20 vision. I can put on contacts or glasses to see something at a distance just as clearly…

This is the _one_ thing I miss about getting my eyesight fixed. Within a month of getting laser surgery, it was so natural that I'd essentially forgotten the experience of glasses and contacts, as though I'd never experienced the previous 20 years with them. One of my very favorite things to do before then was sit in Central Park, or at the Diversey Rocks in Chicago, or anywhere with lots of color, remove my glasses,…

Why not just buy some glasses that blur up your vision? And then go put them on in Central Park?

Re: Lasik’s Risks Are Coming into Sharper Focus

#65
post #6

I had LASIK and PRK. Dry eyes? Check Can’t see shit in low light? Check Weird itchy feeling? Rare, but check It’s still a huge improvement over glasses or contacts. I probably ha e 5-10 years left before I need glasses again due to old age but I’ll enjoy it until then.

Maybe it's because I've been wearing glasses for literally as long as I can remember, but wearing glasses sounds much better than dry eyes and loss of night vision.

I am now at the point where I do need basic reader type glasses.

In most other ways, my vision is good, and I don't have night artifacts. Would take a lot for those to be worth it.

After using them for a while, I agree.

Re: Lasik’s Risks Are Coming into Sharper Focus

#66
post #62

had LASIK two years ago. dry eyes and starbursts quite a bit in the first 6 months, but the dryness is gone now and night time vision is good. I can live with very minor starbursts/halos at night that don't interfere with my vision vs having contacts or glasses. the procedure got me to 20/15 and I'm seeing more clarity than I ever did with glasses or contacts. I was told about still requiring reading glasses when you…

I should add that I was an excellent candidate with plenty of corneal tissue and the procedure was using the latest equipment and techniques. The place I went to was reputable and turned a lot of people away because they were not good candidates. I wonder if any less reputable places are performing the procedure on higher risk people and this contributes to an increase in serious side effects?

Re: Lasik’s Risks Are Coming into Sharper Focus

#68
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is the _one_ thing I miss about getting my eyesight fixed. Within a month of getting laser surgery, it was so natural that I'd essentially forgotten the experience of glasses and contacts, as though I'd never experienced the previous 20 years with them. One of my very favorite things to do before then was sit in Central Park, or at the Diversey Rocks in Chicago, or anywhere with lots of color, remove my glasses,…

Why not just buy some glasses that blur up your vision? And then go put them on in Central Park?

make sure they're rose-tinted too

Re: Lasik’s Risks Are Coming into Sharper Focus

#69
post #8

I'd like to see some more statistics backing this article, as well as real evidence. Who are the doctors that these people are seeing? Is the survey only finding the population of dissatisfied people? I got PRK a year ago and have zero issues, and I've also never been sent a survey from NYT asking if I have problems. I know 11 people who got LASIK/PRK and no one has reported issues yet. There's no way a procedure tha…

My eye doctor basically told me that I should never do lasik and should do PRK instead. The risk of complications is WAY lower, even if the recovery is a pain.

Re: Lasik’s Risks Are Coming into Sharper Focus

#70
The biggest problem for me was that one of the temporary protective contact lenses that they give you after the surgery came out after a couple of days.

It was the most painful experiences of my life, absolutely execrutiating. A friend rushed me back to the clinic where they replaced it, and put me on some painkillers that pretty much knocked me out for a couple of days.

Other than that, no regrets, my quality of life is much better since I had it done.

Post reply on HN