Live data from Hacker News

Eric Schmidt: “Our competitor is Bing”

liveside.net

21–30 of 61 posts

Re: Eric Schmidt: “Our competitor is Bing”

#21
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's a pretty big whole for Bing to miss. Probably doesn't track as well since it requires a mistyped query -- most people doing comparisons of relevance compare correctly typed queries. But a big hole for real world usage... at least I'd think so.

I can't tell if that whole is intentional.

You're query is irrelevant.

Re: Eric Schmidt: “Our competitor is Bing”

#24
post #11

Very good interview. I think it's smart that he is not underestimating Bing. Mr. Schmidt also has great comments clarifying Google's position on the net neutrality announcement with Verizon (about 12:00 mark).

Agreed. I also found it a very informative video

Re: Eric Schmidt: “Our competitor is Bing”

#26
post #19

can somebody explain how being on facebook stops people from searching on google?

In MBA world there is this somewhat confused notion that if Facebook's search engine is powered by Bing then people who use Facebook a lot will naturally/organically start using their search (ie Bing) more.

The halo effect.

I don't think it really plays out because who searches in Facebook, and your browser search box is always present.

Re: Eric Schmidt: “Our competitor is Bing”

#27

Google needs Bing to be moderately successful to avoid an anti-trust lawsuit. Bing is a win for Microsoft either way. If it gets about 30% market share, then Bing makes Microsoft money and forces Google to invest more in search. If even the largest software company after investing billions can't stop Google's growth in search, then Microsoft and others will claim that that Google is a monopoly. So it should be subjec…

Isn't anti-trust designed to prevent people from abusing their monopoly position? For example, Microsoft was the top OS vendor. They wanted to dominate the highly-lucrative Web Browser Vendor business. So, they forced everyone using their popular OS to use their web browser.

The government thought this was an abuse of the monopoly, but the charges didn't stick.

What Google's doing is nothing close to that, though. Nobody uses other search engines because they suck. The results are irrelevant and the ads are irrelevant. That's not anti-competitive action, that's competitive action -- they make a good product that people like. Seems legal to me.

Re: Eric Schmidt: “Our competitor is Bing”

#28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sounds like Bing uses just spell checking rather than n-grams on search queries as Google does.

That's a pretty big whole for Bing to miss. Probably doesn't track as well since it requires a mistyped query -- most people doing comparisons of relevance compare correctly typed queries. But a big hole for real world usage... at least I'd think so.

I agree. The first thing I would do, if writing a search engine, would be to do Google-style phrase corrections.

(Although lately, I find it too aggressive. When googling obscure error messages, it usually "do you mean"-s it into a less obscure error message that I already understand. Sigh.)

Re: Eric Schmidt: “Our competitor is Bing”

#29
post #22
post #19

can somebody explain how being on facebook stops people from searching on google?

I guess, the more time they spend on Facebook, the less time they spend googling?

Two different activities. If I want a map from 123 Fake St. to 742 Evergreen Terrace, I am going to use Google Maps, not Facebook. If I want to know how many degrees Fahrenheit 100 Celcius is, I'm not going to ask Facebook, I'm going to ask Google.

If I want to look at drunken pictures of my friends, though, then I will definitely use Facebook. I use each tool for what it's good for, and I think most other people do the same because it comes naturally.

(I hate structured socialization, though, so I don't use Facebook. But I can accept that I'm abnormal in that respect.)

Re: Eric Schmidt: “Our competitor is Bing”

#30

Google needs Bing to be moderately successful to avoid an anti-trust lawsuit. Bing is a win for Microsoft either way. If it gets about 30% market share, then Bing makes Microsoft money and forces Google to invest more in search. If even the largest software company after investing billions can't stop Google's growth in search, then Microsoft and others will claim that that Google is a monopoly. So it should be subjec…

Isn't anti-trust designed to prevent people from abusing their monopoly position? For example, Microsoft was the top OS vendor. They wanted to dominate the highly-lucrative Web Browser Vendor business. So, they forced everyone using their popular OS to use their web browser. The government thought this was an abuse of the monopoly, but the charges didn't stick. What Google's doing is nothing close to that, though. No…

Google 'email'. Now gmail might have the top position organically, but if Google is a clear monopoly the DoJ might come a-knocking just to make sure.
Post reply on HN