Live data from Hacker News

Giteabot account was compromised

github.com

1–10 of 66 posts

Re: Giteabot account was compromised

#3

Has anyone taken a look at the binaries themselves to see what they do and how they differ from the official releases?

Far as I know, no. Asked this question on the issue page. Really want to find out as I have at least one server that could have been affected. Kind of frustrating that this is all the information there is.

Re: Giteabot account was compromised

#5
Funny to see this news posted on github, after people having suggested gitea as a viable platform to migrate your github projects to ever since the MS buyout.

Good thing on them being open about it though, despite it probably costing them some potential traction.

Re: Giteabot account was compromised

#7
post #5

Funny to see this news posted on github , after people having suggested gitea as a viable platform to migrate your github projects to ever since the MS buyout. Good thing on them being open about it though, despite it probably costing them some potential traction.

Many projects are ironically this way. Gitea, gogs, yunohost, sandstorm to name a few.

Re: Giteabot account was compromised

#8
post #5

Funny to see this news posted on github , after people having suggested gitea as a viable platform to migrate your github projects to ever since the MS buyout. Good thing on them being open about it though, despite it probably costing them some potential traction.

Perfect time to attack, really. Take advantage of the MS+Github hysteria and hunt for some exploits while people are scrambling around to migrate elsewhere.

Probably a bit of exaggeration there, but there's a good chance that whatever was used to exploit Gitea has been there for quite a long time. A leaked personal access token for the bot account that was there for the taking all the time, if someone cared to scan their CI logs. Something like that.

Re: Giteabot account was compromised

#9
post #5

Funny to see this news posted on github , after people having suggested gitea as a viable platform to migrate your github projects to ever since the MS buyout. Good thing on them being open about it though, despite it probably costing them some potential traction.

Many projects are ironically this way. Gitea, gogs, yunohost, sandstorm to name a few.

I think they solve different problems. Gogs is amazing for a self hosted git repo. Not so much for collaborating with thousands of people around the world. Centralization can be a very good thing if done by an ethical company with the right incentives. The only reason decentralization is useful is when you can't trust anyone for anything. I'd rather live in, and work towards, a world where that's not the case.
Post reply on HN