AI at Google: our principles
blog.google
AI at Google: our principles
1–10 of 418 posts
Re: AI at Google: our principles
#2Re: AI at Google: our principles
#3Re: AI at Google: our principles
#4The choice not to accept business is a hard one. I've recently turned away from precision-metrology work where I couldn't be certain of its intent; in every other way, it was precisely the sort of work I'd like to do, and the compensation was likely to be good.
These stated principles are very much in line with those that I've chosen; a technology's primary purpose and intent must be for non-offensive and non-surveillance purposes.
We should have a lot of respect for a company's clear declaration of work which it will not do.
Re: AI at Google: our principles
#5> We want to be clear that while we are not developing AI for use in weapons, we will continue our work with governments and the military in many other areas. These include cybersecurity, training, military recruitment, veterans’ healthcare, and search and rescue.
I wonder if this is an official response to the people at Google[1] who were protesting[2] against Project Maven.
[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/04/technology/google-letter-...
[2] https://static01.nyt.com/files/2018/technology/googleletter....
Re: AI at Google: our principles
#6This statement will have zero impact on subsequent sensational headlines or posters here claiming Google is making killbots.
Re: AI at Google: our principles
#7Also point 5 is an outright, blatant falsehood given Google’s track record and indeed entire business model.
Re: AI at Google: our principles
#8Reminded me of their first principle, and how well they did with that one: "Don't be evil"
Re: AI at Google: our principles
#9Reminded me of their first principle, and how well they did with that one: "Don't be evil"