Edited those typos.
Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub
131–140 of 1001 posts
Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub
#132This is sad news. Partially because I don't care for Microsoft, but mostly because Github was a neutral third-party without any priorities. I hope they don't discontinue Atom or apply their UX styling to the site/desktop app. Like Spotify, I felt safer that a company was just doing hosting in their domain (of music or code projects) and wouldn't try to shovel some other tech into it like Apple making Apple Music terr…
Hadn't crossed my mind that they might drop Atom for VS Code before...
Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub
#133I am worried that a company as important to the open-source community as github is now owned by one of the major players. I think it really impacts the neutrality of github. If I would compete with microsoft in a certain space, I would really think twice about relying on github. Also, this monopolization is driving me mad.
Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm also optimistic they'll revamp GitHub's pricing structure. Their current price of $7 a month is absolutely absurd for individual developers. I can get a pretty decent VPS for $2 a month cheaper. Considering that most of their competitors give small teams free private repos, their price should be half of that. I understand that they have a lot of open source projects to subsidize and all, but I highly doubt a lot…
I don't understand why a solo dev needs to host his private repos somewhere. You can just keep it on your machine, and have it backed up with the rest of your data. And given git is distributed, you should be able to work with teams w/o requiring Github.
Right now I use VSTS for private repos, but it'd be nice to be on GitHub were the vast majority of open source projects are hosted.
Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub
#135 Microsoft [...] is now one if the biggest contributors to GitHub
Citation needed ?Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub
#136GitHub became too expensive. I’m curious to see the new pricing model.
Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
the history of Microsoft is the reason why we all reacting this way. But encouraged by the move they made lately coming into Linux, even though other players have forced their hand
Microsoft has slain giants before. They will try to do it again. No one is too big to fail.
Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub
#138Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub
#139I worry about github too. BUT, at least with github most of the data is open. And they have a worthy competitor in Gitlab. Might be a bit of disruption if MS mess things up, but not a disaster.
Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub
#140Oh god, I hope not. Anytime a big company acquires almost anything, the quality level drops off a cliff. Microsoft with Skype is the obvious example, but so is anything bought by Google (like YouTube). Add to this the bad experience we had with Sourceforge, and I definitely worry it could be all over for GitHub if this is true.