Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub

bloomberg.com

131–140 of 1001 posts

Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub

#131
Smart and inevitable, to secure dominance in the talent vertical. I remember walking into an org where none of the engineers or UX folks had Linkedin accounts. They didn't need it to land in a healthy workplace w/ a decent salary. They were active on GitHub instead, had Angellist profiles. One of them mentioned LI's InMail tool drove him away. Another said he can network just fine with Meetup and twitter.

Edited those typos.

Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub

#132

This is sad news. Partially because I don't care for Microsoft, but mostly because Github was a neutral third-party without any priorities. I hope they don't discontinue Atom or apply their UX styling to the site/desktop app. Like Spotify, I felt safer that a company was just doing hosting in their domain (of music or code projects) and wouldn't try to shovel some other tech into it like Apple making Apple Music terr…

> I hope they don't discontinue Atom

Hadn't crossed my mind that they might drop Atom for VS Code before...

Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub

#133

I am worried that a company as important to the open-source community as github is now owned by one of the major players. I think it really impacts the neutrality of github. If I would compete with microsoft in a certain space, I would really think twice about relying on github. Also, this monopolization is driving me mad.

Only way to disrupt monopoly is to use something else. I am going to migrate all my projects from GitHub. Be an example you want the world to be.

Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub

#134
post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm also optimistic they'll revamp GitHub's pricing structure. Their current price of $7 a month is absolutely absurd for individual developers. I can get a pretty decent VPS for $2 a month cheaper. Considering that most of their competitors give small teams free private repos, their price should be half of that. I understand that they have a lot of open source projects to subsidize and all, but I highly doubt a lot…

I don't understand why a solo dev needs to host his private repos somewhere. You can just keep it on your machine, and have it backed up with the rest of your data. And given git is distributed, you should be able to work with teams w/o requiring Github.

It's a convenience thing for me. As a hobbyist solo dev it'd be nice to have a place to work on code across different devices in private and then open it up when I feel the code is mature enough and the time is right to put it out there under an open source license.

Right now I use VSTS for private repos, but it'd be nice to be on GitHub were the vast majority of open source projects are hosted.

Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub

#137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

the history of Microsoft is the reason why we all reacting this way. But encouraged by the move they made lately coming into Linux, even though other players have forced their hand

Microsoft has slain giants before. They will try to do it again. No one is too big to fail.

Except HSBC.

Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub

#139

I worry about github too. BUT, at least with github most of the data is open. And they have a worthy competitor in Gitlab. Might be a bit of disruption if MS mess things up, but not a disaster.

Except for the social part as far as I know, I hope that Bitbucket could see this as a big opportunity and expand that aspect of their platform.

Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub

#140
post #43

Oh god, I hope not. Anytime a big company acquires almost anything, the quality level drops off a cliff. Microsoft with Skype is the obvious example, but so is anything bought by Google (like YouTube). Add to this the bad experience we had with Sourceforge, and I definitely worry it could be all over for GitHub if this is true.

Youtube would probably be dead if not for Google.
Post reply on HN