Live data from Hacker News

Why We Engage in FLOSS: Answers from Core Developers

arxiv.org

61–63 of 63 posts

Re: Why We Engage in FLOSS: Answers from Core Developers

#61

I've never understood it. I've only had horrific experiences with my open source efforts. From the simplest cases like being ignored on PRs and tickets to mockery in social circles for algorithmic mistakes to finding out my work was enabling bad people to finding out people were misrepresenting my employment status while using my work in violation of the license, I don't think I've ever once had a positive experience…

> From the simplest cases like being ignored on PRs

You're not entitled to having your PRs merged, or even having anyone look at them. PRs not of particular interest to those maintaining the project simply get low priority. Especially with volunteer work, time is limited and while your PR might appear large and of importance to you, it may not look like that from other perspectives.

Re: Why We Engage in FLOSS: Answers from Core Developers

#62
My takeaway from the paper (read two months ago) was that core contributors looking to encourage more core contributors should focus on making great software which will have dedicated users some of whom might be motivated to help project eventually as a core contributor.

Re: Why We Engage in FLOSS: Answers from Core Developers

#63
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I can't figure out what this would mean, or how it is relevant to open source as opposed to proprietary software. It's not unique to open source. > Those last two seem exceptional. But you should report the person who was mocking you for making a mistake. That kind of behavior has no place in FLOSS and should be stamped out. There is a reason I switched away from the MIT license. Someone unrelated was using my name…

I don't see how a different license would have helped you here? The license has no influence on someone misrepresenting your relationship with his company, that's just not covered in software licenses. You probably switched to GPL to make your software less directly usable for companies?

The 3-clause BSD license includes:

"Neither the name of the nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission."

Post reply on HN