First there was mansplaining, now there's devsplaining.
More clearly. I don’t think you know what mansplaining means.
41–45 of 45 posts
First there was mansplaining, now there's devsplaining.
More clearly. I don’t think you know what mansplaining means.
1. Is this for real? 2. Here are exactly two things that you need to memorize in order to make this sort of talk productive: a) I don't know what X is, sorry. Can you tell me what that is/Can you explain to me what it does? b) I'm not sure I follow. I thought X is [...]/does [...], what am I missing? 3. Did anyone who actually knows what these things mean review these definitions? E.g: Vanilla: "Plain or basic, often…
>This sort of matches what an API is in web land, if you squint a little. If someone were to ask me what that definition describes, "API" is about the last thing I'd say. I struggle with defining simple things like this, and I think what author offers is a good generic way to define API. This definition includes any actual way I can imagine one can get (programmatic) access to generic service that does not belong to…
An API is like a restaurant menu, but for software. A menu tells a person what they can request from a restaurant. An API tells a programmer what their software can request from other software.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
>This sort of matches what an API is in web land, if you squint a little. If someone were to ask me what that definition describes, "API" is about the last thing I'd say. I struggle with defining simple things like this, and I think what author offers is a good generic way to define API. This definition includes any actual way I can imagine one can get (programmatic) access to generic service that does not belong to…
A user interface is how a person talks to software. An API is how software talks to software. An API is like a restaurant menu, but for software. A menu tells a person what they can request from a restaurant. An API tells a programmer what their software can request from other software.
The second part is true when there is a documentation.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except for the part where a bunch of the definitions are wrong, misleading, or woefully incomplete.
>Except for the part where a bunch of the definitions are wrong, misleading, or woefully incomplete. Examples?
First there was mansplaining, now there's devsplaining.
‘Mansplaining’ “You Keep Using That Word, I Do Not Think It Means What You Think It Means” More clearly. I don’t think you know what mansplaining means.
That is unnecessarily hostile comment.
I don't care what you think. I know what it means and you have exactly zero reason to publicly doubt that.