Study: Traffic lights should respond to cars, not the other way around
1–10 of 75 posts
Re: Study: Traffic lights should respond to cars, not the other way around
#2Re: Study: Traffic lights should respond to cars, not the other way around
#3Re: Study: Traffic lights should respond to cars, not the other way around
#4If they optimize the flow of cars in a little time there will be more people using cars in those areas and no operations researcher can solve that bigger traffic jam. People, like any biological entity, adapt to the environment.
Re: Study: Traffic lights should respond to cars, not the other way around
#5http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Monderman
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.12/traffic.html
there is also a brief interview on youtube with him explaining his theory of change.
Re: Study: Traffic lights should respond to cars, not the other way around
#6Re: Study: Traffic lights should respond to cars, not the other way around
#7If they remove timers from lights entirely, they better improve the sensors. There are already numerous lights that do not detect the presence of my motorcycle.
Re: Study: Traffic lights should respond to cars, not the other way around
#8Well, then just remove the lights and go back to cars responding to cars.
Also: Roundabouts.
Edit: I guess I should read the two links that I open in background tabs _before_ posting. Now I feel like a fool.
Re: Study: Traffic lights should respond to cars, not the other way around
#9If they remove timers from lights entirely, they better improve the sensors. There are already numerous lights that do not detect the presence of my motorcycle.
When I'm riding my bike and I need to turn left, I'll jump up and down on the sensor. I look like an idiot, but usually it works! ;)